Robert Spencer over at Jihad Watch has published a list of points in answer to some of his critics, I thought that I would do the same! But unlike Spencer I've decided not to bullshit(Why is it all these learned men, criticise Islam, lay out sensible arguments, then fail to make logical conclusions based on the facts?)
1. Islam is not a race. One does not become a racist by opposing Islam.
2. I actually do wish to drive all Muslims out of the West.
3. I beleive that good Muslims are by definition wicked followers of Satan, some Muslims may be good people, but by definition are bad Muslims. The best Muslims are recovering Muslims!
4. I have said that Muslims want to kill Jews and Christians, but they would get a bigger kick out of enslaving us and taxing us.
5. Islam is inconpatable with mankind, civilisation and basic decency! FACT!
Spain is cool by the way, quite civilised, not to many Moors where I am, although the ones that are here stand out like sewage in a bed of roses!
Wednesday, November 22, 2006
Saturday, November 18, 2006
Saturday, November 11, 2006
Thursday, November 09, 2006
The War on Terror is over!
The bad news: We lost!
The war is over, and it is the Muslims who have won.
We may have overthrown the Taliban and Saddam, but the Taliban are back, in force, attacking our boys, wearing our resolve down(which don't take much)
Saddam may very well swing, but it no longer matters, because we have already lost Iraq. We should have flattened Fallujah when they dragged dismembered westerners throught the street, instead we allowed them weeks in which to prepare to fight us, whilst withdrawing their best.
We allowed our press to humiliate us, to commit treason, to act as propigators of enemy propaganda ie: Abu Ghraib (that was not torture!) and Guantanamo.
We condemned Israel as it fought to protect itself, we hampered their efforts and have left them looking weak and vulnerable.
Spain surrendered to Al Qaida after they were attacked, Italy left for a quiet life, and now it seems Americans have decided 3000 dead soldiers is too much!
If this is the case, then we deserve to lose. The thing about this conflict is that we can't bear death, our enemy actively seeks it out.
Only one side can win this, right now, it is not us!
From the Guardian
"One Frenchman, 53-year-old teacher Jean-Pierre Charpemtrat, said it was about time U.S. voters figured out what much of the rest of the world already knew.
``Americans are realizing that you can't found the politics of a country on patriotic passion and reflexes,'' he said. ``You can't fool everybody all the time - and I think that's what Bush and his administration are learning today.''
Bush is deeply unpopular in many countries, with particularly intense opposition to the war in Iraq, the U.S. terror holding facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and allegations of Washington-sanctioned interrogation methods that some equate with torture.
Many said they thought the big gains by Democrats signaled the beginning of the end of Bush's tenure.
In Copenhagen, Denmark, Jens Langfeldt, 35, said he didn't know much about the midterm elections but was opposed to Bush, referring to the president as ``that cowboy.''
In Sri Lanka, some said they hoped the rebuke would force Bush to abandon a unilateral approach to global issues.
``The Americans have made it clear that current American policy should change in dealing with the world, from a confrontational approach, to a more consensus-based and bridge-building approach,'' said Jehan Perera, a political analyst. The Democratic win means ``there will be more control and restraint'' over U.S. foreign policy.
Passions were even higher in Pakistan, where Bush is deeply unpopular despite billions in aid and support for President Gen. Pervez Musharraf.
One opposition lawmaker, Hafiz Hussain Ahmed, said he welcomed the election result, but was hoping for more. Bush ``deserves to be removed, put on trial and given a Saddam-like death sentence,'' he said.
In Denmark, Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen told broadcaster TV2 he hoped the president and the new Congress would find ``common ground on questions about Iraq and Afghanistan.''
``The world needs a vigorous U.S.A.,'' Fogh Rasmussen said.
The prospect of a sudden change in American foreign policy could also be troubling to U.S. allies such as Britain, Japan and Australia, which have thrown their support behind the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.
Asked whether the resignation of Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld signaled a new direction in the war that has claimed the lives of more than 2,800 U.S. troops, Bush said, ``Well, there's certainly going to be new leadership at the Pentagon.''
``The problem for Arabs now is, an American withdrawal (from Iraq) could be a security disaster for the entire region,'' said Mustafa Alani, an Iraqi analyst for the Gulf Research Center in Dubai. He said the Middle East could be left to cope with a disintegrating Iraq mired in civil war, with refugees fleeing a failed state that could become an incubator for terrorism."
"One Frenchman, 53-year-old teacher Jean-Pierre Charpemtrat, said it was about time U.S. voters figured out what much of the rest of the world already knew.
``Americans are realizing that you can't found the politics of a country on patriotic passion and reflexes,'' he said. ``You can't fool everybody all the time - and I think that's what Bush and his administration are learning today.''
Bush is deeply unpopular in many countries, with particularly intense opposition to the war in Iraq, the U.S. terror holding facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and allegations of Washington-sanctioned interrogation methods that some equate with torture.
Many said they thought the big gains by Democrats signaled the beginning of the end of Bush's tenure.
In Copenhagen, Denmark, Jens Langfeldt, 35, said he didn't know much about the midterm elections but was opposed to Bush, referring to the president as ``that cowboy.''
In Sri Lanka, some said they hoped the rebuke would force Bush to abandon a unilateral approach to global issues.
``The Americans have made it clear that current American policy should change in dealing with the world, from a confrontational approach, to a more consensus-based and bridge-building approach,'' said Jehan Perera, a political analyst. The Democratic win means ``there will be more control and restraint'' over U.S. foreign policy.
Passions were even higher in Pakistan, where Bush is deeply unpopular despite billions in aid and support for President Gen. Pervez Musharraf.
One opposition lawmaker, Hafiz Hussain Ahmed, said he welcomed the election result, but was hoping for more. Bush ``deserves to be removed, put on trial and given a Saddam-like death sentence,'' he said.
In Denmark, Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen told broadcaster TV2 he hoped the president and the new Congress would find ``common ground on questions about Iraq and Afghanistan.''
``The world needs a vigorous U.S.A.,'' Fogh Rasmussen said.
The prospect of a sudden change in American foreign policy could also be troubling to U.S. allies such as Britain, Japan and Australia, which have thrown their support behind the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.
Asked whether the resignation of Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld signaled a new direction in the war that has claimed the lives of more than 2,800 U.S. troops, Bush said, ``Well, there's certainly going to be new leadership at the Pentagon.''
``The problem for Arabs now is, an American withdrawal (from Iraq) could be a security disaster for the entire region,'' said Mustafa Alani, an Iraqi analyst for the Gulf Research Center in Dubai. He said the Middle East could be left to cope with a disintegrating Iraq mired in civil war, with refugees fleeing a failed state that could become an incubator for terrorism."
What happened to America?
Well, now that was unexpected!
The Democrats hold both the Senate and the House of Representatives, leaving Canada, Australia and the UK the only remaining nations fully committed to this 'war', and here I was thinking the UK would be the first to fold.
Once Blair leaves office next year, that leaves Australia as the only nation fully committed to Iraq, and Australia and Canada the only ones fuly committed to Afghanistan.
The problem with this situation, is that these nations can't hold the line by themselves, they need the US and it's armed forces, so once America leaves, then Canada and Australia must also leave. If this happens, then what country in their right mind would ever risk going to war with the US ever again?
John Howard the brilliant Australian Prime Minister, who risked going into both Afghanistan and Iraq, and who has won reelection, would be left looking like a fool, and once burned, how many other American Presidents would he support if say, we had to invade Iran or North Korea?
Or Stephen Harper, the promising new Canadian Prime Minister, who has recommitted Canada to Afghanistan, how many other military situations would he concern himself with if he is forced to abandon Afghanistan?
The Democrats lost the Vietnam war, Australia and New Zealand had also been fighting with the Americans, they left in the early seventies when it became obvious that the Democrats had already abandoned Vietnam to the communists.
Being burned once is bad enough, being burned twice may leave the Anglosphere terminally fractured!
The Democrats hold both the Senate and the House of Representatives, leaving Canada, Australia and the UK the only remaining nations fully committed to this 'war', and here I was thinking the UK would be the first to fold.
Once Blair leaves office next year, that leaves Australia as the only nation fully committed to Iraq, and Australia and Canada the only ones fuly committed to Afghanistan.
The problem with this situation, is that these nations can't hold the line by themselves, they need the US and it's armed forces, so once America leaves, then Canada and Australia must also leave. If this happens, then what country in their right mind would ever risk going to war with the US ever again?
John Howard the brilliant Australian Prime Minister, who risked going into both Afghanistan and Iraq, and who has won reelection, would be left looking like a fool, and once burned, how many other American Presidents would he support if say, we had to invade Iran or North Korea?
Or Stephen Harper, the promising new Canadian Prime Minister, who has recommitted Canada to Afghanistan, how many other military situations would he concern himself with if he is forced to abandon Afghanistan?
The Democrats lost the Vietnam war, Australia and New Zealand had also been fighting with the Americans, they left in the early seventies when it became obvious that the Democrats had already abandoned Vietnam to the communists.
Being burned once is bad enough, being burned twice may leave the Anglosphere terminally fractured!
Sunday, October 22, 2006
Democracy, how it has died
What is wrong with our 'leaders' our politicians?
Is there anyone who has any balls any more?
This David Cameron of the British Conservatives is frustrating to watch, he is a contemptible fellow, who is blatantly out for peoples votes at any cost.
He takes his cue from the leftist pressure groups of the establishment, he is constantly harping on about the environment and quelle suprise, the BBC say that he is a serious contender for the next election?
He bores on about 'wimin an efnics'
This is contemptible!
Firstly, although one could be forgiven for thinking that 90% of this country is black and Muslim from watching the BBC and it's (irritatingly PC)dramas, (not so funny)comedies and its (clearly biased) News programmes, the fact is that ALL 'efnic' minorities together make up only 6% of the total population!
Surprised? I was, I thought that every one was in the process of bearing a half caste baby with some ethnic! I was also shocked to hear that up to 75% of people in this country consider themselves Christian? Wow, I thought everyone was atheist or Muslim (or in the process of converting)
Tiss strange how reality is different on TV?
On the BBC it is only the antiwar-anticapitalist-ecowarrior-anti Bush-Che admiring communist that is given an easy time.
When ever an heretic is on, well, they can expect personal attack, smearing and ridicule (by highly ignorant illiterates)If one does not completely agree with Darwin's THEORY of evolution, one is called a moron, if one does not agree that the war on terror is EVIL, then you yourself are EVIL. If you do not believe that we are responsible for global warming (if it is indeed taking place) then you are a dangerous Neo Con!(cue terrified screams) If you think Socialised health and welfare are a waste of money and should be abolished or privatised, you are an Evil, uncaring, dangerous Thatcherite Neo Con Bush stooge! (cue more screams and hissing)
Ignorance such as displayed on the BBC, on pretty much any debate, needs to be confronted confidently by learned and patient men who will expose the folly and willful ignorance of the left. They also need to expose these hateful agitators for what they are, enemies in our midst, enemies who in any other time would have been exiled, imprisoned or executed.
Instead we have David Cameron, a nit wit, who knows no principles, no decency and has no thought as to what is truly important today. All he does is spout shite about the environment!
It seems that democracy is failing, 30 years of socialist education has dumbed down our culture and produced a whole new breed of ignorant, miseducated, uncaring and most importantly for communists, malleable electorate.
They will now vote for anything as long as it promises them a free education (complete with communist brain washing), free health, free pensions, free money for feckless single sluts, free money for staying home when one does not want to work.
I am beginning to think that the only thing that can save this country is a military take over by a 'Franco figure', someone who can save this country from itself, force the idiots along the right path!
What is the alternative?
Allah u Akbar!
Is there anyone who has any balls any more?
This David Cameron of the British Conservatives is frustrating to watch, he is a contemptible fellow, who is blatantly out for peoples votes at any cost.
He takes his cue from the leftist pressure groups of the establishment, he is constantly harping on about the environment and quelle suprise, the BBC say that he is a serious contender for the next election?
He bores on about 'wimin an efnics'
This is contemptible!
Firstly, although one could be forgiven for thinking that 90% of this country is black and Muslim from watching the BBC and it's (irritatingly PC)dramas, (not so funny)comedies and its (clearly biased) News programmes, the fact is that ALL 'efnic' minorities together make up only 6% of the total population!
Surprised? I was, I thought that every one was in the process of bearing a half caste baby with some ethnic! I was also shocked to hear that up to 75% of people in this country consider themselves Christian? Wow, I thought everyone was atheist or Muslim (or in the process of converting)
Tiss strange how reality is different on TV?
On the BBC it is only the antiwar-anticapitalist-ecowarrior-anti Bush-Che admiring communist that is given an easy time.
When ever an heretic is on, well, they can expect personal attack, smearing and ridicule (by highly ignorant illiterates)If one does not completely agree with Darwin's THEORY of evolution, one is called a moron, if one does not agree that the war on terror is EVIL, then you yourself are EVIL. If you do not believe that we are responsible for global warming (if it is indeed taking place) then you are a dangerous Neo Con!(cue terrified screams) If you think Socialised health and welfare are a waste of money and should be abolished or privatised, you are an Evil, uncaring, dangerous Thatcherite Neo Con Bush stooge! (cue more screams and hissing)
Ignorance such as displayed on the BBC, on pretty much any debate, needs to be confronted confidently by learned and patient men who will expose the folly and willful ignorance of the left. They also need to expose these hateful agitators for what they are, enemies in our midst, enemies who in any other time would have been exiled, imprisoned or executed.
Instead we have David Cameron, a nit wit, who knows no principles, no decency and has no thought as to what is truly important today. All he does is spout shite about the environment!
It seems that democracy is failing, 30 years of socialist education has dumbed down our culture and produced a whole new breed of ignorant, miseducated, uncaring and most importantly for communists, malleable electorate.
They will now vote for anything as long as it promises them a free education (complete with communist brain washing), free health, free pensions, free money for feckless single sluts, free money for staying home when one does not want to work.
I am beginning to think that the only thing that can save this country is a military take over by a 'Franco figure', someone who can save this country from itself, force the idiots along the right path!
What is the alternative?
Allah u Akbar!
Happy Ramadan!
From the Infidel Bloggers Alliance:
"Have you ever wondered why violence increases during Ramadan?, well Ramadan is the celebration of the Battle of Badr, so you see the "Holy" month is actually a celebration of death of the non believer, this concept has not changed since that Battle and Muslims around the world celebrate this event by attacking the non believer where ever they can, wheteher it be Iraq or Paris , below is the Islamic view of the Battle, I am looking for a Quereshi perspective, if I find one I will post it...................Gandalf
With the Battle of Badr begans a remarkable Era in the history of Islam. The emigration of the Holy Prophet (S.A.W) to Medina had turned the enemies from Mecca more hostile, and they constantly kept on thinking how they could overthrow him, and put an end to Islam. The battle of Badr was the most important among the Islamic battles of Destiny. For the first time the followers of the new faith were put into a serious test. Had victory been the lot of the pagan army while the Islamic forces were still at the beginning of their developments, the faith of Islam could have come to an end. This battle laid the foundation of the Islamic State and made out of the Muslims a force to be reckoned with by the dwellers of the Arabian Peninsula.There is more on the battle here"
And we have our national leaders giving 'Happy Ramadan' addresses to these savages, and what are they thinking when they listen to these grovelling examples of dhimmi-hood? They are dreaming about the day we are their cleaners and street sweeps, they lust after our women and crack a filthy grin imagining what they will do to them. They laugh at the naivety of our leaderless leaders, they have contempt for our feminised politicians!
Really, who can blame them?
"Have you ever wondered why violence increases during Ramadan?, well Ramadan is the celebration of the Battle of Badr, so you see the "Holy" month is actually a celebration of death of the non believer, this concept has not changed since that Battle and Muslims around the world celebrate this event by attacking the non believer where ever they can, wheteher it be Iraq or Paris , below is the Islamic view of the Battle, I am looking for a Quereshi perspective, if I find one I will post it...................Gandalf
With the Battle of Badr begans a remarkable Era in the history of Islam. The emigration of the Holy Prophet (S.A.W) to Medina had turned the enemies from Mecca more hostile, and they constantly kept on thinking how they could overthrow him, and put an end to Islam. The battle of Badr was the most important among the Islamic battles of Destiny. For the first time the followers of the new faith were put into a serious test. Had victory been the lot of the pagan army while the Islamic forces were still at the beginning of their developments, the faith of Islam could have come to an end. This battle laid the foundation of the Islamic State and made out of the Muslims a force to be reckoned with by the dwellers of the Arabian Peninsula.There is more on the battle here"
And we have our national leaders giving 'Happy Ramadan' addresses to these savages, and what are they thinking when they listen to these grovelling examples of dhimmi-hood? They are dreaming about the day we are their cleaners and street sweeps, they lust after our women and crack a filthy grin imagining what they will do to them. They laugh at the naivety of our leaderless leaders, they have contempt for our feminised politicians!
Really, who can blame them?
Sunday, October 15, 2006
How to clean one's toilet - the fun way
Instructions on how to clean your toilet
1. Put both lids of the toilet up and add 1/8 cup of pet shampoo
to the water in the bowl.
2. Pick up the cat and soothe him while you carry him towards the
bathroom.
3. In one smooth movement, put the cat in the toilet and close
both lids. You may need to stand on the lid.
4. The cat will self agitate and make ample suds. Never mind the
noises that come from the toilet, the cat is actually enjoying this.
5. Flush the toilet three or four times. This provides a "power-
wash" and rinse".
6. Have someone open the front door of your home. Be sure that
there are no people between the bathroom and the front door.
7. Stand behind the toilet as far as you can, and quickly lift
both lids.
8. The cat will rocket out of the toilet, streak through the
bathroom, and run outside where he will dry himself off.
9. Both the commode and the cat will be sparkling clean.
Sincerely,
The Dog
1. Put both lids of the toilet up and add 1/8 cup of pet shampoo
to the water in the bowl.
2. Pick up the cat and soothe him while you carry him towards the
bathroom.
3. In one smooth movement, put the cat in the toilet and close
both lids. You may need to stand on the lid.
4. The cat will self agitate and make ample suds. Never mind the
noises that come from the toilet, the cat is actually enjoying this.
5. Flush the toilet three or four times. This provides a "power-
wash" and rinse".
6. Have someone open the front door of your home. Be sure that
there are no people between the bathroom and the front door.
7. Stand behind the toilet as far as you can, and quickly lift
both lids.
8. The cat will rocket out of the toilet, streak through the
bathroom, and run outside where he will dry himself off.
9. Both the commode and the cat will be sparkling clean.
Sincerely,
The Dog
Sunday, October 08, 2006
The problem is those damned creationists!
It seems absurd that secularists seem intent on attacking fundamentalist Christianity when the true challenge to our civilisation is Islam, not Christianity.
On Sky News last week, the news readers were interviewing an elderly gentleman titled a 'scientist' by Sky and he had just been awarded the Secular Society's Freedom of Speech Award. What was the reason for this award? Did he boldly denounce jihad? Or perhaps he ridiculed the very obvious scientific holes contained in the Koran?
Well actually he was given this prize due to his 'bold' refutaion of (drum role) CREATIONISM!
Well done sir! The world burns and he takes pot shots at creationists, he patronisingly mocks Christian fundamentalists (who are not generally known to detonate themselves against their enemies) and tip toes over Muslims (who are known on the odd occasion to detonate themselves on public transport for a variety of 'reasons')
It must take so much raw courage to mock those terrifying Christians! So much gall!
Whether one beleives something or not is generally not anyones elses business. I don't beleive in all the mumbo jumbo that the Mormons believe, but it is their business, they are generally decent law abiding citizens, why critisise them for their beliefs?
Lefties love to talk about 'freedom of speech' when what they actually mean is 'freedom to mock others who don't agree with you as long as they are not likely to kill you' or 'freedom to believe what we believe and nothing else'
True freedom of speech can and does include respect, however if something is not deserving of respect, such as Islam and it's twisted practices or the Roman Catholic Church and it's pervy priests, then it deserves ridicule and mockery!
I was unable to find anything on the award by the Secular Society, but see if you can find it for yourself at www.secularism.org.uk
On Sky News last week, the news readers were interviewing an elderly gentleman titled a 'scientist' by Sky and he had just been awarded the Secular Society's Freedom of Speech Award. What was the reason for this award? Did he boldly denounce jihad? Or perhaps he ridiculed the very obvious scientific holes contained in the Koran?
Well actually he was given this prize due to his 'bold' refutaion of (drum role) CREATIONISM!
Well done sir! The world burns and he takes pot shots at creationists, he patronisingly mocks Christian fundamentalists (who are not generally known to detonate themselves against their enemies) and tip toes over Muslims (who are known on the odd occasion to detonate themselves on public transport for a variety of 'reasons')
It must take so much raw courage to mock those terrifying Christians! So much gall!
Whether one beleives something or not is generally not anyones elses business. I don't beleive in all the mumbo jumbo that the Mormons believe, but it is their business, they are generally decent law abiding citizens, why critisise them for their beliefs?
Lefties love to talk about 'freedom of speech' when what they actually mean is 'freedom to mock others who don't agree with you as long as they are not likely to kill you' or 'freedom to believe what we believe and nothing else'
True freedom of speech can and does include respect, however if something is not deserving of respect, such as Islam and it's twisted practices or the Roman Catholic Church and it's pervy priests, then it deserves ridicule and mockery!
I was unable to find anything on the award by the Secular Society, but see if you can find it for yourself at www.secularism.org.uk
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
