Russia and the 'Free World'

George Bush has declared that Russia's actions in Georgia has damaged it's relations with the 'Free World', hmmmmm!

The same Free World where it's governments unleash millions of third world savages on their own people?

The same Free World where the indigenous peoples are banned from objecting to this third world invasion, sponsored by it's governments, and threatened with persecution and imprisonment if they do oppose it?

The same Free World where half of our incomes are stolen by those very same states, much of it to pay for the health, lodgings, employment (or more often unemployment) and education of the same third world invaders?

The same Free World where we are told we have the power to 'change things', when in fact all we have is different versions of the same political prostitutes who are selling their peoples down the river?

Well, if that is the Free World, I want nothing to do with it, Although Russia is not perfect, at least their leaders don't sell their people down the river for a quick buck, at least they don't steal half their incomes to pay for a third world invasion of African and Islamic savages, which they then unleash against their people!

We are being lied to, we are being whored out for the benefit of these political pimps, the same ones who now condemn Russia for protecting their own people, I know who I would rather have rule me!

Russophobia and Gerorgia

So, when the Serbs try to reassert their authority over land that is theirs, in fact the historic heart of their nation and chase out the invaders, that is evil and NATO must then bomb the shit out of the Serbs to prevent them to recapture their land!

When Georgia does the very same in Ossetia and the Russians take the place of NATO, then it is Russia that is the bad guy?

So George Bush condemns Russia for 'violating' the territorial sovereignty of Georgia, right! What happened in Iraq in 2003?

What happened in Vietnam in the sixties and seventies?

Did Vietnam or Iraq kill American troops in Kuwait or the Gulf of Tonkin?

Russia borders Georgia, the Ossetians wants nothing to do with Georgia and would prefer to be absorbed by Russia, the Georgians under the insane Saakashvilli attacked Ossetia and Russia responded.

Russia did not 'invade' Georgia as many western papers stated, the retaliated against a cocky Georgia.

Perhaps Saakashvilli thought the Americans would ride to his aid? Perhaps he thought the Russians would stand by and let him humiliate them, he was wrong!

Russia is in the right, perhaps they will use this to crush Georgia and overthrow Saakashvilli, well he can't say it's not partly his fault, can he?

With the Ukraine now making unhelpful statements regarding the Russian naval bases in the Crimea, it seems this may turn into something more dangerous, I hope the Ukrainians are only sabre rattling, because they would not be best serve with a war with Russia.

I am amazed at the naked hatred of Russia I have seen in 'conservative' blogs over the past two days, it seems one rule for us, another for Russia, apparently Russia must swallow all defeats and humiliations without comeback, whilst we, in the west must right every wrong and 'free' all peoples, even against their will! This is arrogance of the highest kind, it is Russia to which we should be looking for hope and protection, it is Russia that has successfully fought and beat Muslims in the recent past, not us, it is Russia that has some of the worlds largest energy reserves, not us, it is Russia that is seeing a Christian renaissance and a rediscovery of it's past, not us!

America seems weak now, it is divided and bankrupt, it's armies are broken and overstretched, it has lost its way in the 'war on terror' and like the rest of the west is being swamped by invading immigrants, Russia is strong, it is Russia we need to look to now, antagonising them now would be a folly of historic proportions.

A sad day!

Well, Radovan Karadzic has finally been caught!

The left are having fits of euphoria, running all the old anti-Serb propaganda, talking of the innocent Muslims, and the nasty Serbs!

They have already condemned Mr Karadzic, even though they insist he will face a trial! Why? The result is already known, they will find him guilty! He opposed elite liberal opinion, he stood by his own people, he waged a war for the survival of the Serbs in Bosnia, and for this, he will be found guilty.

The left don't care if you kill people or have responsibility for thousands or millions of deaths, the only care why you killed them! If, you killed them to return your country to a year zero, or if you killed people to redistribute property or just killed those who opposed you, they don't care, as long as you are a lefty, as long as you have signed up to all the trendy modern causes, they will give you a pass!

If, on the other hand, you fight for your ethnic group, against another ethnic group who also are of a different religion, and you do it for ethnic, national and religious reasons, then any deaths resulting are evil! Look at the difference in treatment between the rulers of China, Vietnam and South Africa on the one side and the Christian Lebanese, Bosnian Serbs, Russians and Kosovan Serbs on the other!

There seems to be a pattern, if you are white, and you fight against blacks then the whites are evil, Rhodesia, Apartheid South Africa and Darfur are examples of this, if you are 'ethnic', but you are Christian and are fighting the Muslims, (Same colour) then it's the Christians you are baddies, the Maronite Christians and Armenians are in this category.

If both are white but one side is Muslim, then they become the default 'goodies' in the MSM and among western governments, who, never missing an opportunity to fuck their own up the arse in favour of Muslims, will align themselves to our enemies!

The MSM reaction to the capture of Mr Karadzic is perverse, as was the treatment of the Serbs in the Yugoslavian wars of the 1990s. We were told day after day, week after week that the Serbs had started the wars, that they were purposefully continuing the wars and were the only ones killing 'innocents'.

And most of us believed it!

Well it is now known that Chechens, Afghans, Iranians and other Muslims were in Bosnia fighting the Serbs, that they would viciously murder the Serbs they captured, video it and use it in pro-Islamic propaganda. Hizbollah, Al Qaida and the Muslim Brotherhood were in Bosnia, funded not only by their own people, but by Western governments, especially the British and American governments!

Now, I'm sure most of us are quite used to knowing our governments are at best whores, and at worst traitors, but surely this is unbelievable? That the British and American governments were sending money to Iran so that they could fund Hizbollah who were murdering Christian Serbs in Bosnia!

So in effect we were funding Hisbollah! Through our taxes!

But of course, it's always the cartoon baddies that the MSM goes after, never after the traitors in our governments (well, they wouldn't, would they)

And what is ironic, is that we may have to look for many Mr Karadzics in the West to ethnically cleanse us of all the hordes of minorities who reside here and are still coming in!

Who will look the fool then?

Resumption of service!

Ah well, that took longer then I thought!

It's been an interesting few months, the economy is going into meltdown, our glorious leaders, those imbeciles, are thrashing around feigning that they actually know anything about economics, whilst fucking people up the arse with more taxes, more fines, and debasing the currency in a reckless stupid and shortsighted fashion.

Then Gordon Brown, goes back on Labour's manifesto pledge to hold a referendum on the European Constitution, that lying spiv Brown and that shower of mediocre, treasonous shits that make up the cabinet make up some ridiculous non-sense that the Lisbon Treaty is different from the Constitution. What a crock of shit!

America seems likely to be electing Barrack Obama, some lefty half caste with an axe to grind, someone who's loyalty to the US seems at best, suspect, and whats worse, most of White America seems fine with it!!

Ron Paul was a non-event in the Republican primaries, proving that Americans seem as dedicated to their own destruction as are Europeans, what a sad state of affairs!

A storm is coming, it is the judgement awaiting us for our own craven surrender in the face of aggressive third worlders, for our selling of our birthrights, for our embrace of a destructive nihilism where there is no right, no standard, no morality and no loyalty!

This storm will be lit by the coming economic cataclysm, it will be stoked by the racial and sectarian divides that are the results of the massive and reckless immigration policies, and kept going by our complete detachment from reality!

It is, I believe, a storm we deserve and need!

Enoch Powell's 'River of Blood' speach

Note how moderate it really is, and remember how this man was smeared by the establishment who were in fear after he spoke the truth. He was smeared and destroyed, has anyone learned? Apparently not as Nigel Hasitlow has discovered! Much to Cameron's continued shame!



"The supreme function of statesmanship is to provide against preventable evils. In seeking to do so, it encounters obstacles which are deeply rooted in human nature.

One is that by the very order of things such evils are not demonstrable until they have occurred: at each stage in their onset there is room for doubt and for dispute whether they be real or imaginary. By the same token, they attract little attention in comparison with current troubles, which are both indisputable and pressing: whence the besetting temptation of all politics to concern itself with the immediate present at the expense of the future.

Above all, people are disposed to mistake predicting troubles for causing troubles and even for desiring troubles: "If only," they love to think, "if only people wouldn't talk about it, it probably wouldn't happen."

Perhaps this habit goes back to the primitive belief that the word and the thing, the name and the object, are identical.

At all events, the discussion of future grave but, with effort now, avoidable evils is the most unpopular and at the same time the most necessary occupation for the politician. Those who knowingly shirk it deserve, and not infrequently receive, the curses of those who come after.
A week or two ago I fell into conversation with a constituent, a middle-aged, quite ordinary working man employed in one of our nationalised industries.

After a sentence or two about the weather, he suddenly said: "If I had the money to go, I wouldn't stay in this country." I made some deprecatory reply to the effect that even this government wouldn't last for ever; but he took no notice, and continued: "I have three children, all of them been through grammar school and two of them married now, with family. I shan't be satisfied till I have seen them all settled overseas. In this country in 15 or 20 years' time the black man will have the whip hand over the white man."

I can already hear the chorus of execration. How dare I say such a horrible thing? How dare I stir up trouble and inflame feelings by repeating such a conversation?

The answer is that I do not have the right not to do so. Here is a decent, ordinary fellow Englishman, who in broad daylight in my own town says to me, his Member of Parliament, that his country will not be worth living in for his children.

I simply do not have the right to shrug my shoulders and think about something else. What he is saying, thousands and hundreds of thousands are saying and thinking - not throughout Great Britain, perhaps, but in the areas that are already undergoing the total transformation to which there is no parallel in a thousand years of English history.

In 15 or 20 years, on present trends, there will be in this country three and a half million Commonwealth immigrants and their descendants. That is not my figure. That is the official figure given to parliament by the spokesman of the Registrar General's Office.

There is no comparable official figure for the year 2000, but it must be in the region of five to seven million, approximately one-tenth of the whole population, and approaching that of Greater London. Of course, it will not be evenly distributed from Margate to Aberystwyth and from Penzance to Aberdeen. Whole areas, towns and parts of towns across England will be occupied by sections of the immigrant and immigrant-descended population.

As time goes on, the proportion of this total who are immigrant descendants, those born in England, who arrived here by exactly the same route as the rest of us, will rapidly increase. Already by 1985 the native-born would constitute the majority. It is this fact which creates the extreme urgency of action now, of just that kind of action which is hardest for politicians to take, action where the difficulties lie in the present but the evils to be prevented or minimised lie several parliaments ahead.

The natural and rational first question with a nation confronted by such a prospect is to ask: "How can its dimensions be reduced?" Granted it be not wholly preventable, can it be limited, bearing in mind that numbers are of the essence: the significance and consequences of an alien element introduced into a country or population are profoundly different according to whether that element is 1 per cent or 10 per cent.

The answers to the simple and rational question are equally simple and rational: by stopping, or virtually stopping, further inflow, and by promoting the maximum outflow. Both answers are part of the official policy of the Conservative Party.

It almost passes belief that at this moment 20 or 30 additional immigrant children are arriving from overseas in Wolverhampton alone every week - and that means 15 or 20 additional families a decade or two hence. Those whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad. We must be mad, literally mad, as a nation to be permitting the annual inflow of some 50,000 dependants, who are for the most part the material of the future growth of the immigrant-descended population. It is like watching a nation busily engaged in heaping up its own funeral pyre. So insane are we that we actually permit unmarried persons to immigrate for the purpose of founding a family with spouses and fiancés whom they have never seen.

Let no one suppose that the flow of dependants will automatically tail off. On the contrary, even at the present admission rate of only 5,000 a year by voucher, there is sufficient for a further 25,000 dependants per annum ad infinitum, without taking into account the huge reservoir of existing relations in this country - and I am making no allowance at all for fraudulent entry. In these circumstances nothing will suffice but that the total inflow for settlement should be reduced at once to negligible proportions, and that the necessary legislative and administrative measures be taken without delay.

I stress the words "for settlement." This has nothing to do with the entry of Commonwealth citizens, any more than of aliens, into this country, for the purposes of study or of improving their qualifications, like (for instance) the Commonwealth doctors who, to the advantage of their own countries, have enabled our hospital service to be expanded faster than would otherwise have been possible. They are not, and never have been, immigrants.

I turn to re-emigration. If all immigration ended tomorrow, the rate of growth of the immigrant and immigrant-descended population would be substantially reduced, but the prospective size of this element in the population would still leave the basic character of the national danger unaffected. This can only be tackled while a considerable proportion of the total still comprises persons who entered this country during the last ten years or so.

Hence the urgency of implementing now the second element of the Conservative Party's policy: the encouragement of re-emigration.

Nobody can make an estimate of the numbers which, with generous assistance, would choose either to return to their countries of origin or to go to other countries anxious to receive the manpower and the skills they represent.

Nobody knows, because no such policy has yet been attempted. I can only say that, even at present, immigrants in my own constituency from time to time come to me, asking if I can find them assistance to return home. If such a policy were adopted and pursued with the determination which the gravity of the alternative justifies, the resultant outflow could appreciably alter the prospects.

The third element of the Conservative Party's policy is that all who are in this country as citizens should be equal before the law and that there shall be no discrimination or difference made between them by public authority. As Mr Heath has put it we will have no "first-class citizens" and "second-class citizens." This does not mean that the immigrant and his descendant should be elevated into a privileged or special class or that the citizen should be denied his right to discriminate in the management of his own affairs between one fellow-citizen and another or that he should be subjected to imposition as to his reasons and motive for behaving in one lawful manner rather than another.

There could be no grosser misconception of the realities than is entertained by those who vociferously demand legislation as they call it "against discrimination", whether they be leader-writers of the same kidney and sometimes on the same newspapers which year after year in the 1930s tried to blind this country to the rising peril which confronted it, or archbishops who live in palaces, faring delicately with the bedclothes pulled right up over their heads. They have got it exactly and diametrically wrong.

The discrimination and the deprivation, the sense of alarm and of resentment, lies not with the immigrant population but with those among whom they have come and are still coming.
This is why to enact legislation of the kind before parliament at this moment is to risk throwing a match on to gunpowder. The kindest thing that can be said about those who propose and support it is that they know not what they do.

Nothing is more misleading than comparison between the Commonwealth immigrant in Britain and the American Negro. The Negro population of the United States, which was already in existence before the United States became a nation, started literally as slaves and were later given the franchise and other rights of citizenship, to the exercise of which they have only gradually and still incompletely come. The Commonwealth immigrant came to Britain as a full citizen, to a country which knew no discrimination between one citizen and another, and he entered instantly into the possession of the rights of every citizen, from the vote to free treatment under the National Health Service.

Whatever drawbacks attended the immigrants arose not from the law or from public policy or from administration, but from those personal circumstances and accidents which cause, and always will cause, the fortunes and experience of one man to be different from another's.
But while, to the immigrant, entry to this country was admission to privileges and opportunities eagerly sought, the impact upon the existing population was very different. For reasons which they could not comprehend, and in pursuance of a decision by default, on which they were never consulted, they found themselves made strangers in their own country.

They found their wives unable to obtain hospital beds in childbirth, their children unable to obtain school places, their homes and neighbourhoods changed beyond recognition, their plans and prospects for the future defeated; at work they found that employers hesitated to apply to the immigrant worker the standards of discipline and competence required of the native-born worker; they began to hear, as time went by, more and more voices which told them that they were now the unwanted. They now learn that a one-way privilege is to be established by act of parliament; a law which cannot, and is not intended to, operate to protect them or redress their grievances is to be enacted to give the stranger, the disgruntled and the agent-provocateur the power to pillory them for their private actions.

In the hundreds upon hundreds of letters I received when I last spoke on this subject two or three months ago, there was one striking feature which was largely new and which I find ominous. All Members of Parliament are used to the typical anonymous correspondent; but what surprised and alarmed me was the high proportion of ordinary, decent, sensible people, writing a rational and often well-educated letter, who believed that they had to omit their address because it was dangerous to have committed themselves to paper to a Member of Parliament agreeing with the views I had expressed, and that they would risk penalties or reprisals if they were known to have done so. The sense of being a persecuted minority which is growing among ordinary English people in the areas of the country which are affected is something that those without direct experience can hardly imagine.

I am going to allow just one of those hundreds of people to speak for me:

“Eight years ago in a respectable street in Wolverhampton a house was sold to a Negro. Now only one white (a woman old-age pensioner) lives there. This is her story. She lost her husband and both her sons in the war. So she turned her seven-roomed house, her only asset, into a boarding house. She worked hard and did well, paid off her mortgage and began to put something by for her old age. Then the immigrants moved in. With growing fear, she saw one house after another taken over. The quiet street became a place of noise and confusion. Regretfully, her white tenants moved out.

“The day after the last one left, she was awakened at 7am by two Negroes who wanted to use her 'phone to contact their employer. When she refused, as she would have refused any stranger at such an hour, she was abused and feared she would have been attacked but for the chain on her door. Immigrant families have tried to rent rooms in her house, but she always refused. Her little store of money went, and after paying rates, she has less than £2 per week. “She went to apply for a rate reduction and was seen by a young girl, who on hearing she had a seven-roomed house, suggested she should let part of it. When she said the only people she could get were Negroes, the girl said, "Racial prejudice won't get you anywhere in this country." So she went home.

“The telephone is her lifeline. Her family pay the bill, and help her out as best they can. Immigrants have offered to buy her house - at a price which the prospective landlord would be able to recover from his tenants in weeks, or at most a few months. She is becoming afraid to go out. Windows are broken. She finds excreta pushed through her letter box. When she goes to the shops, she is followed by children, charming, wide-grinning piccaninnies. They cannot speak English, but one word they know. "Racialist," they chant. When the new Race Relations Bill is passed, this woman is convinced she will go to prison. And is she so wrong? I begin to wonder.”
The other dangerous delusion from which those who are wilfully or otherwise blind to realities suffer, is summed up in the word "integration." To be integrated into a population means to become for all practical purposes indistinguishable from its other members.

Now, at all times, where there are marked physical differences, especially of colour, integration is difficult though, over a period, not impossible. There are among the Commonwealth immigrants who have come to live here in the last fifteen years or so, many thousands whose wish and purpose is to be integrated and whose every thought and endeavour is bent in that direction.

But to imagine that such a thing enters the heads of a great and growing majority of immigrants and their descendants is a ludicrous misconception, and a dangerous one.

We are on the verge here of a change. Hitherto it has been force of circumstance and of background which has rendered the very idea of integration inaccessible to the greater part of the immigrant population - that they never conceived or intended such a thing, and that their numbers and physical concentration meant the pressures towards integration which normally bear upon any small minority did not operate.

Now we are seeing the growth of positive forces acting against integration, of vested interests in the preservation and sharpening of racial and religious differences, with a view to the exercise of actual domination, first over fellow-immigrants and then over the rest of the population. The cloud no bigger than a man's hand, that can so rapidly overcast the sky, has been visible recently in Wolverhampton and has shown signs of spreading quickly. The words I am about to use, verbatim as they appeared in the local press on 17 February, are not mine, but those of a Labour Member of Parliament who is a minister in the present government:

'The Sikh communities' campaign to maintain customs inappropriate in Britain is much to be regretted. Working in Britain, particularly in the public services, they should be prepared to accept the terms and conditions of their employment. To claim special communal rights (or should one say rites?) leads to a dangerous fragmentation within society. This communalism is a canker; whether practised by one colour or another it is to be strongly condemned.'

All credit to John Stonehouse for having had the insight to perceive that, and the courage to say it.

For these dangerous and divisive elements the legislation proposed in the Race Relations Bill is the very pabulum they need to flourish. Here is the means of showing that the immigrant communities can organise to consolidate their members, to agitate and campaign against their fellow citizens, and to overawe and dominate the rest with the legal weapons which the ignorant and the ill-informed have provided. As I look ahead, I am filled with foreboding; like the Roman, I seem to see "the River Tiber foaming with much blood."

That tragic and intractable phenomenon which we watch with horror on the other side of the Atlantic but which there is interwoven with the history and existence of the States itself, is coming upon us here by our own volition and our own neglect. Indeed, it has all but come. In numerical terms, it will be of American proportions long before the end of the century.

Only resolute and urgent action will avert it even now. Whether there will be the public will to demand and obtain that action, I do not know. All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal."

Why America must vote for Ron Paul!

Americans have only one real choice for president in 2008 and he is Ron Paul! He is the only candidate who will limit government, he is the only candidate who will lower taxes, he is the only man who will attempt to reign in America's reckless spending, borrowing and printing of money.

Most importantly, he is the only candidate who could spark a restoration of the West.

Ron Paul is something unusual for an elected representative, he is honest, decent, honourable, wise, moral and straightforward!

He is a Christian, who is repelled by abortion, he opposes the heavy handedness of government, its theft of people's money (tax) and is committed to the abolition of the IRS, Income Tax, the CIA, FBI, NSA, Dept of Labour, Education, Homeland Security, the Federal Reserve, Dept of Health, etc...

He is committed to getting rid of America's deficit, restoring sound money and pulling all American troops out of ALL foreign fields, not just Iraq and Afghanistan!

Social Welfare and Medicare would be put on a transition to abolision.

He opposes any amnesty of illegal immigrants and will act to build a fence on the Mexican border, he would withdraw from the UN, OAS, NAFTA, WTO, World Bank, NATO and a myriad of other useless international organisations.

This truly is radically different to any other candidate and must be a truer representation of many conservative's views.

Some of these things are stuff I can only dream about, and you Americans have the chance to support him and deliver yourselves from Big Government and socialism for good!

The reason I want Paul to win, is that the example displayed to the rest of the world would inspire so many to ask, "well if the Yanks are getting rid of their Income tax, then why can't we"?

People will ask, "well the Yanks left the UN, what is it actually for"?

If Those United States abolish whole departments of state, then they may ask, "do we actually need these twenty or thirty departments"?

And if a President Paul stops illegal immigration into those United States, people over here may ask, "well if America can stop illegal immigration with a thousand mile border fence and good policing, why can't we do it when we are an island"?

The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are lost, they were a long time ago by weak willed and lily livered politicians who can only do something once they have the latest polling results before them. there is no point supporting Guilliani or McCain because they support the war, Guilliani is not exactly someone who supports liberty and McCain is all for illegal immigration and amnesty. Why any conservative would vote for Romney with his doubling of public spending whilst governor of Massachusetts or his legalising of gay marriage is beyond me, he is no conservative.

Paul is the only true conservative, he could inspire us all, he could be exactly what our elites fear and would hate, an honest man of integrity who can't be smeared by this hateful clique.

All this elite desires is our money, power over our lives, the opportunity to control what we think and do, and increasingly the desire to know us inside out, to implement an ID card, not only in the UK but in those United States too. They are even touting plans to put microchips(called RFID) inside of us!!

Already in England, the government is ready to roll out a programme that would be able to track all vehicles in the UK from satellite, they talk about a new 'pay as you drive scheme', but don't bet that they will then abolish the Vehicle Tax once this has been implemented. Every vehicle in the country must now have a black box which records the speed of the vehicle, which can be checked by police at any time.

Now it they can do that with cars, imagine what they could do with us? Implant a chip and hey presto, they will have complete power over our lives. Granted they are probably too stupid to go round being deliberately evil, but you don't have to be smart to fuck someone life up!! Think of all the mistakes government and government agencies make on a regular basis!

Our masters continue to allow massive third world immigration, why? Not only to these people form a very handy pool of loyal votes, patrons of the government, they also are guaranteed to attack us, usually mugging us or raping our women, but the odd time they detonate a bomb on bus or a train, all very convenient for governments, who can grab more power and tell us they are doing this for our good!!!

When we protest we are labelled 'racists', 'homophobes', 'xenophobes', 'right wing nuts', 'mean' and they go on doing exactly what they always wanted to do, namely fuck us sideways.

It all seems so convenient, they unleash these savages on us, we get attacked and then the government, the very same people who unleashed the savages on us, come to our rescue, only there is a price, we must give up some liberty, just a small bit, not a lot, but then this happens year after year, always they come to rescue us from the same thing, the beast they have unleashed on us!

Strange no? Suspicious even?

Our elites are already too powerful, they control the MSM, education and every branch of government. They control the international establishment, trade and currencies. There is little we can do against such raw power and might, but, there is one thing you can do if you are a citizen of those United States, you can vote for Ron Paul and shake things up, this act could undo much that this international elite of slimy backstabbing shits, have worked so hard for over the past 60 years, go on please do us all a favour and vote Ron Paul.

The Swiss and the Poles, God love 'em

Both Switzerland and Poland are the new enemies of the left, they have committed the ultimate blasphemy of rejecting the self destructive ideologies of those that hate the white Christian West.

Switzerland has elected a 'right wing' party into government, a party opposed to immigration and multi-culturalism. A party explicitly pro-Swiss. Those lucky Swiss bastards!

The New York Times is horrified; "As part of its platform, the SVP party has begun a campaign seeking the 100,000 signatures necessary to force a referendum to let judges deport foreigners after they serve prison sentences for serious crimes. The measure also calls for the deportation of the entire family if the convicted criminal is a minor.

Human rights advocates warn that the initiative is reminiscent of the Nazi practice of Sippenhaft, or kin liability, under which relatives of criminals were held responsible and punished for their crimes. "

This policy sounds a quite sensible one, I and many I speak to would gladly support it, only those untouched by the feral packs of black men that roam the streets of this once great city, would think the above statement abhorrent.

The New York Times is also in shock at a few posters produced by the SVP (Swiss Peoples Party) one shows a black sheep with some white sheep and the words 'For Security'. the other I managed to find on the net (shown bellow), shows the hands of non-whites trying to grab Swiss passports, which if any of you know what Africans are like will recognise immediately as all too true.

The left, so used to us meekly giving in to threats and bullying are shocked by this insolence from us plebs, how dare we stand up for ourselves, how dare nasty white people do anything that may result in Africans getting deported or getting less benefits, shock horror!!

The Poles, well they are far too Christian to be true 'Europeans' in the Brussels sense of the word, which invariably means, atheist, cynical, effete, promiscuous, contemptuous of our past, our race and our culture.

On Wednesday 10 October 2007 was "European day against the death penalty." The EU wanted to inaugurate the event with a common European declaration against capital punishment. Poland thwarted this by refusing to sign the declaration because the EU did not condemn abortion and euthanasia as well. Last month, during an EU meeting on the death penalty, the Polish justice minister confronted his Danish colleague with Denmark's annual 15,000 abortions and the latter — a member of the Danish Conservative Party — got so angry that she left the room, slamming the door."

I must say, I admire the balls of the Poles, but instead of being ashamed of their double standards, what do the other states do, well Portugal and Belgium accuse Poland of being immoral! Just how did they manage to reason that one out?

"Richard Howitt, a British Labor politician and the vice president of the European Parliament's human rights subcommittee, said that Poland's refusal to reject the death penalty brings into question its commitment to European values."

Again, these values are as stated above, atheism, cynicism, promiscuity and contempt for who we are, seems to me a virtue to lack 'European values'.

"Last April, the European Parliament accused Poland of 'homophobia" because it does not want to include homosexuality in the school curriculum. Last May, the European Court of Human Rights found Poland guilty of violating human rights because it banned a "gay pride" parade in Warsaw. Last year, the European Commission threatened to deprive Warsaw of its voting rights in the European institutions if it remained in "serious breach of its obligations on human rights."

Banning a parade of degenerate perverts from performing sex acts on each other in public is banned, and this is bad? Do you see how inverted morality in this 'Europe' truly is? Not poisoning children's minds with gay porn is somehow wrong? Wrong for whom? Normal people, faggots, perverts, paedophiles?

What is wrong with these people? They seem intent on dismantling all normality, all common sense, all morality and rightness for what? There must be an aim these sodomites have in mind?

The final and complete destruction of the white Christian West seems to be their intent, why import millions of Muslims and Africans otherwise? Why encourage us to breed with 'ethnics' or not to breed at all? Why sponsor and celebrate sodomy as if it were a sacrament of modern socialism?

Those people in charge of this new Europe are evil, and that is not an exaggeration, they are committed to our destruction, to the genocide of the white peoples, to the extermination of Christendom. They have committed themselves to every depravity in the cause of weakening and demoralising the white man and they must be stopped. Democracy is a sham they use to control us, they feign difference between them at election time, one part poses as the right and the other as the left, when in fact both are as committed as each other, to the radical theories of the Jacobins and Bolsheviks.

The Jacobins destroyed France and raped the soul of that great nation, the Bolsheviks ripped out the heart of Holy Russia and stamped on it destroying it in the process, now their heirs unite to finish off Europe and the white race as a whole.

God help us

Whats so great about democracy?

Blair, Bush, Brown and all the others 'leaders' make a big huh hah over something called 'democracy' or 'democratic rights', it sounds great if you don't think to hard!

What the hell's democracy anyway?

This present government was elected with about a quarter of the national vote, but got well over half the seats. Is that democracy?

This government has signed numerous European Treaties into law without asking the people of this nation. Is that democracy?

They abolished the old pound shillings and pence without consulting the people, they foisted the metric system on us, and prosecute traders who sell in pounds and ounces, even though no one thinks in kilograms! Is that your precious democracy?

This government and previous governments have allowed millions, yes that's right, millions of immigrants and refugees to pour into the nation in what can only be describes as a slow motion government sponsored genocide of the indigenous peoples of these islands. Is this democracy?

Democracy is in fact a weasel word! It is meaningless! Democracy can be anything you want it to be, as proved by this current government and their sleazy ways of doing things.

Democracy is a cover for the criminal and coward, it gives a fig leaf of respectability when they are up to no good. They just claim, 'this is democracy in action', 'this is the will of the people' etc, etc...

The fact that I can scrawl a mark on a piece of paper every 5 years means shit! What a big fucking deal, that really makes a fucking difference! And if you think it does make a difference, you are delusional!

At most it makes minor changes now and then, the real power in this nation is the propaganda, used, harnessed and marketed by amoral prostitutes such as Rupert Murdoch, who is only out to make yet more money( this is the guy who renounced his citizenship, so he could take up American citizenship to own a few rags and Fox)

They could not care less who is in power, as long as they are good for business! It seems strange, in 1997, the press, the entire press was going through some sort of religious experience with regards Tony Blair, I was convinced Labour would annihilate the Tories, and then they did.

What was not told was that Blair got less votes nationwide in 1997 then Major got in 1992. 14,093,007 for Major in 1992 and Blair's 1997 landslide of 13,518,167, not to worry, this story was buried as it would not fit in with the media induced anti-Tory atmosphere!

That would be hard to do now as we have this fine medium to garner news and information from, but back then, the internet was used exclusively for porn.

Remember it is perception that wins out!

Democracy, what a crock of shit, it has abolished capital punishment, legalised abortion, liberalised divorce, decriminalised homosexuality, joined the European Union, signed up to the International Criminal Court, the European Court of Human Rights. Democracy resulted in the legalised sodomising of 16 year olds, pot smoking junkies on every corner, tens of thousands of Gypsies begging and thieving in every city centre, Somalian teenaged boys, running around in gangs robbing and raping all around them, Muslims preaching death to the infidel and detonating themselves on public transport.

This is democracy, this is what it is! Every single thing mentioned above was qualified when passed, when capital punishment was abolished, they promised us that 'life would mean life', they lied, life now means 5 years in prison, murder actually pays in this country!

When abortion was passed, they vowed it was a very limited type of abortion, only those women who were physically unable or who were mentally unable would be allowed abort a child, they lied here too. We now effectively have abortion on demand.

When they decriminalised homosexuality, they said it would not be the thin end of the wedge, that this was a humane thing to do, perhaps, but with this they lied and betrayed us too. We now have gay marriage, gay adoption and 40 year old men sodomising 16 year old boys.

Immigration is something we have been lied to by these cynical fucks for the past 40 years. Some parts of this country are no longer British, they have minarets towering over the streets, women walking about in shawls or burqas. We have white women being raped, or just shagged by these ethnics and then left when they fall pregnant. We have whole streets strewn with filth and rubbish like some Algerian casbah. Gypsies, everywhere, with their filthy nasty offspring they beg on the corners and on the underground, they pick pocket and thieve, and when caught they wipe vaginal fluids on the police officers so as to make an allegation of sexual assault latter on. These politicians, these democratically elected politicians lied to us about this too, they assured us that immigration would be controlled.

These democratically elected politicians lied, lied and lied again. This in a democracy!

Perhaps it's time we had a bit more aristocracy or monarchy?

The House of Lords has always been more sensible then that other house, the house of scoundrels and liars and thieves. The house of Lords worked and worked well because they were not elected, they did not have to make vacuous statements, they did not have to make promises that they would break, they did not even have to turn up if they did not have the interest, they went unpaid with no offices. How glorious is that? A house full of people there not through lies and theft and cheating and party hackery, but there because of an accident of birth, some plonkers yes, but they usually did not bother to ever turn up, but the great minds, the decent men who would never have otherwise spoken in Parliament or stood for election as they had lives to live and did not have to temerity to lie so readily.

Well, that house of thieves and scum has chased out the decent house, no more hereditary peers, no more unelected Dukes or Barons or Earls, good men, decent patriotic men who attempted to revise the worst legislation vomited up from the lower house, they also had great and honest debates regarding the great issues of the day, something the rightly entitled lower house would never deign to debate!

What is so great about democracy?

I really can only think of waste, lies and wickedness unbound from their stained and immoral hands.

Democracy, it's an expensive destructive lie!

I wish for my liberty, the freedom to live as I wish, democracy and democratically elected politicians are in direct opposition to this aim.

The best thing for us all would be to abolish the House of Commons, and restore the House of Lords in all its former glory and power!

Then perhaps we can rest and live our lives as we would, knowing their lordships are directing the affairs of state with wisdom and humility not lying to us, not sleezing about for votes not steeling from us!

Let the cry be heard, Abolish the Commons!

Girl fed to oblivious punters!

Sometimes something so depraved comes into the open that it genuinely shocks! This is one of them, one that is not being reported by the MSM, only local press are bothering, the reason is that a 14 year old white school girl was murdered, after having sex with a takeaway guy in an alley, and then cut up and fed to the customers!

Now, if this was a case of an ethnic cut up by a whitey! Oh the rage of the MSM would be hard to contain!

"I KILLED her. . . I was just angry."

Albattikhi, 29, had been having sex with Charlene before she died, the jury was told.

She was one of a number of young white girls who went into alleyways behind restaurants in Blackpool to have sex with the men who worked in the takeaways.

What? little girls going to shag 30 year old men? In some grimy alley? This, my friends is what is becoming of our society. This the result of liberalism, the apathy of those who allow or encourage the young to give away their virginity to some grease ball in a smelly alley way! I wonder, is this what those liberals wanted when they set us blindly in this direction?

Did they want us to drown in the filth of our iniquity? Did they desire the final fall of our culture? Did they want little white girls to act as whores don't even do?

This single sentence is repulsive, little girls having sex with 29 or 30 year men! Where were all those fucking social workers and police when this was happening? Organising housing for some fucker that had just got off the boat? Arresting some white man for 'racially aggravated insults'?

This is the fruition of the liberal 'democratic' state, this is your precious 'freedom', freedom to fuck old men, or little girls in some dirty alleyway, freedom to indulge in every filthy depravity you can envisage!

This is not freedom, this is slavery, to our basest instincts! Our leaders make a fine attempt in talking about defending our freedoms and 'democracy', but in truth, they never even knew what freedom was, true freedom, is to be free from this modern day all pervasive state with its corrupting hand and it's whore money!

True freedom entails taking responsibility for one's self and making one's own way in the world. It means not taking handouts, not screwing any system, it means working hard for one's income, it means not thinking of any government as any thing more then an irritant to be avoided or gotten over. It means taking responsibility for one's offspring and not seeing one's daughter become a hobby whore. It means failing and accepting those failures and not blaming others or society or rich people or 'the government' (although the government can be blamed for much more!)

When Blair talks of freedom he talks of the freedom the indulge in depravity and stupidity, to stuff one's self with amphetamines and alcohol to the point of vomiting, to treat sex as some pastime, enough to make the street whores blush!

This is not freedom, it is hedonism and somehow, dangerously, we have confused the two!

D H Lawrence (known for his homosexuality, even he had a better idea of freedom) writes

"Men are free when they are in a living homeland, not when they are straying and breaking away. Men are free when they are obeying some deep, inward voice of religious belief ... Men are free when they belong to a living, organic, believing community, active in fulfilling some unfulfilled, perhaps unrealized purpose ...Men are not free when they are doing just what they like. The moment you can do just what you like, there is nothing you care about doing ..."

Charlene went missing in November 2003. Her body has never been found.

Prosecutor Tim Holroyde, QC, told Preston Crown Court Albattikhi and others had openly talked about Charlene.

He said: "These people were talking about sex with white girls and there was mention of having sex with Charlene."Albattikhi laughed and said she was kinky and she was very small – the plainest possible indication that he was lying to the police when he said he did not know her.

Do you see the contempt that these Arabs have for us as a race? They screw our women and laugh, they see it as we should see it, an act of aggression! Yet we are so apathetic we don't care, so what if my sister is banging some different guy every night of the week, it is her life, so what is my brother is smoking pot! It's not that dangerous! These are the attitudes of those who don't care, those who have capitulated to the liberal tyranny in this land!

If your sister acts like a whore, she is a whore, if your brother acts like some junkie, he is a junkie!

"He and others present were then laughingly saying that Charlene had gone into the kebabs."

Police targeted Albattikhi, a Jordanian immigrant, and his colleague Mohammed Reveshi, who is originally from Iran, after information from witnesses.

Both had a financial stake in Funny Boyz on Dickson Road. Albattikhi is charged with murder while Reveshi, 50, is charged with helping Albattikhi dispose of Charlene's body.

Both men deny the charges and have told police they never knew the girl.

This is the way we live!

Shame on all of us.

Thank God, Blair is going!

But does it mean the beginning of the end of the New Labour project?

Lets hope so!

I always found it odd, that anyone, anywhere could actually like Blair, trust him or think him a decent normal guy! I don't want to blow my own trumpet, but since his election as Labour leader 1994, with his fake smile, hideous wife, jeans and all the other signs of someone who does not take the position of the Queen's prime minister very seriously, I have loathed him and all he stands for!

My prejudice was further entrenched by a book by Leo Mckinstry, a former socialist, who wrote Fit to Govern? in 1996, one year before Blair's landslide victory in 1997.

I told people about Blair, I told them about his lies, the constitutional vandalism he was waiting to unleash, I told them about his europhilia, his stupid, craven crawling to public oppinion!

No one listened!

When he won, I assumed that he wouldn't last, surely now the people would see through this paper cutout of a man?

No, they moaned, but kept on voting for him!

He joined America in bombing another nation, without UN approval, no not Iraq, Serbia, and no one cared!

He sends troops into a failed African state and keeps them there for years, again, no one cares!

He, rapes the constitution of the United Kingdom, with little real response, the glorious and unelected House of Lords, a place that usually is more in step with reality and common sense then the elected House of Commons, was stripped of the old Dukes, Earls, Barons and Marquess', now we are left with a wholly appointed House of Lords (no prizes for guessing who appointed them)

Blair made treason his bedfellow and guide, he wantonly and without recall to our glorious dead, gave away more and more of the ancient liberties of England to those prostitutes in Brussels.

His mistress was the infantile media, he courted it, charmed it and led it any which way he choose, he hoodwinked them and through them many people in this land.

He stood by, and actively participated in the looting of this nation, he took the pensions of the old, he stealthily taxed us, more and more, and then, in two joyous weeks, the people rose up against him and his tyranny, the Fuel Protests of 2000, restored my faith in the people of this land.

But he lied and spinned his way out of that one, infuriatingly, he not only survived, he went on to win the general election of 2001!

His Friends, were liars, adulterers, sodomites, thieves and knaves, they plundered the country, parading their depravity before all to see, they show no shame, no repentance when they are caught, no regret at the damage they have caused, indeed, they claim to have brought a new renaissance to what was a blighted nation!

They have allowed millions of illegals into this country(this is an island, how difficult can it be to secure our borders?) they have allowed these animals to trample over the indigenous people of these islands, they have appeased terrorists at every juncture, seeming to gain pleasure at this appeasement.

This group of sodomites and thieves thinks it quite normal to corrupt and weaken the police forces in this country by accusing them of 'institutional racism' and then to expect that same police force (sorry 'service') to meet a raft of 'targets' to make Britain safe again.

Targets are introduced into the Health Service, Police, Home Office and Immigration. No longer do constables, nurses, civil servants or Immigration officers do their jobs, they fill in forms, justifying their existence to this government of thieves and sodomites!

When targets are not met, the thieves and sodomites change the targets and declare a target achieved, they dumb down exams in schools and with bare faced cheek, they proclaim that children today are better educated then they were even ten or twenty years ago.

This government of knaves and sodomites parades all the failures of the past decade in front of us and declare it a victory! They expect us to celebrate with them, indeed, if we do not celebrate with them, they criminalise us and imprison us in goals filled with immigrant scum, the same scum who came here as refugees and were never deported!

They mock God with their 'gay marriage', they mock us with their failed and ruinous policies.

Anthony Blair did to his credit stand by America after the September 11th attacks in 2001, but even here, he has failed, he has failed to wage war with a lions heart, he has appeased Islam and given it the chance to thrive in this ancient Christian nation.

Thank God he is going, for he has been there far too long, no good came of him, only degredation, and decay.

AMEROGOD

To examine its present trajectory is to discover the state of the American nation irredeemable. The proportion of citizens pickled—like cadavers—in the toxic bromides of multiculturalism is formidable; consequently, the dissolution of the once indivisible American ethos into sects of squabbling ethnicities is all but destined. As for those citizens not so intoxicated, they dwell divided betwixt distraction and despair, in passivity and complacency, awaiting a savior that will never come. And so it is with a hardened heart I hammer out …

AMEROGOD and THE NEW MANIFEST DESTINY

The idea of American Manifest Destiny is not exclusive to the mid-nineteenth century, though the period of imperial "Westward Ho!" is one of the more conspicuous symptoms of that deeper, existential malady—the messianic mission to make the world over in America's image. Not only does this mandate hearken back to the founding of the Republic but, to this very hour, it gallops apace under the banner of global democracy. The crusade to extend salvation across the globe—to make all places not America, America—is matched only by a more recent, penitent reflex to make all places America, un-American. And whereas once American pretensions to empire could bring but shame to the nation for military misadventures or issue punitive slaps to the jingoist’s ego, at home, the uncritical institutionalization of diversity and the aggressive indoctrination of such facile dogmas as "we are a nation of immigrants," must prove even more destructive to the American body politic for they threaten the very existence of the nation itself.

The political knaves and the meretricious mouthpieces of popular culture have spoken: Thou shalt not question immigration—legal or otherwise. "We are a nation of immigrants" goes the benediction and the demons of racism and xenophobia are exorcised back to Dark Ages before the year of our Lord, one thousand nine hundred nineteen and sixty-five. Talk of immigration reform (except to increase the huddled masses yearning to cannibalize the Middle Class at the behest of their elitist wranglers) is tantamount to heresy; indeed, proposing a moratorium during which to examine the environmental, financial and existential consequences of permitting millions of aliens of questionable political allegiances to populate this country is the most damnable offense of all.

That we are a nation of Americans—and not a nation of immigrants—is an elementary civic fact. (Incidentally, Osama bin Laden’s fatwa was not titled “Declaration of War Against All Immigrants.”) Neither fact nor force of history—until that force is brought to bear—will convince the open-borderites that their World Nation of Babel is a destructive delusion. Nor is such utopian idiocy confined to any one political persuasion. It is touted by dim-bulbs named Bush and bloated Bostonians called Kennedy, America-hating Leftists, their puling liberal lapdogs and laissez faire libertarians alike. Corporatists of the Church of Economic Determinism gorge themselves on cheap labor while Evangelicals from the School of Putting los Anuses en los Asientos lustily pack the pews with the ceaseless supply of commodities, consumers and congregants unlimited immigration provides. If America is prohibited from restricting immigration on the belief that we are a “nation of immigrants,” it warrants consideration that if we are, and always have been so, then prior to the 1965 Immigration Reform and Control Act America was a nation of immigrants—almost exclusively of European origin. This, the reconquistadors of La Cuckaracha Raza aught to ponder when next they march their Mexican flag waiving mestizo minions onto American streets. Clearly, immigration policy should be dictated by some other criteria; if not, then perhaps it isn’t too late to correct a certain historical mistake.

The nation killers assure us that none can escape the dizzying, centripetal spin of the great American assimilation machine. In goes the immigrant, out the American: not the proud citizen reverential of America’s historical exceptionalism, but the malleable sort eager only to consume scows of garbage they don't need or that demands little more from their leisure time than to slobber over the tawdry exploits of Hollywood’s latest loose bimbo. (In the very least, they are sufficiently American to vote Democrat or attend Catholic mass.) This is a cynical estimation, but the only one that matters to our governing elites. That they themselves do not truly accept the acculturation of immigrants into the American national family is betrayed by another indubitable truth they trumpet so loudly: Diversity is our greatest strength.

Our leaders pay lip service to assimilation even as they deny a particular American culture exists; and inasmuch as one does, it is vilified as inherently oppressive—a racist, sexist legacy to be openly rejected by the immigrant and native alike. Worse still, group rights have formally replaced the rights of the individual. The government incentivizes factionalism and rewards minorities for maintaining their cultural exclusivity through generous entitlements and policies of affirmative action. Adding more diversity to the already encouraged-to-be-indignant ethic blocs can only lead to future violent, internecine conflict—a civil war that will tear the country apart at its unnatural seams as the nations-within-nations vie against one another for scarce resources.

Lamentably, the just and the wise do not always prevail. As the rhetorical salvos are lobbed and the ideological artillery discharged, from the carnage of our country a hideous new order is bent on ascendancy. Out of the reconstituted ashes of the nation no phoenix spreads its blazing wings but there hatches a hydra—its multifarious heads and snapping beaks hissing the false praises of diversity. The Shining City on the Hill has been trampled into the ground by the hungry hordes. Liberty Enlightening the World stands not as she once did—as an inspiration—but as an easy harlot of the harbor. The Mother of Exiles has cast aside her shining lamp and, like some pagan fertility goddess, invites the huddled masses of the world to milk the bounteous udders of the State bone dry.

America, home of the new mongrel proletariat has become Amerogod, great welfare state to the world.

Source

The Suburbs will explode if Sarkozy wins!

Vote BNP!

There are local elections in England and Wales on May 3rd, there are also assembly elections in Scotland and Wales.

If you want anything to change vote for the BNP!

Even if you are uncomfortable with them as a party, or despise where they came from, the truth is, our political elites will not listen to us if we vote Labour or Conservative or Liberal, or Monster Raving Loony Party!

They will only fear us if we dare to vote BNP!

You see, most of the political class are political prostitutes, they will do almost anything to get into power, they will go on the Jonathan Ross Show, they will play soccer (badly) for all to see, they will feign interest in pop groups, they will say they passionately believe in the environment or Africa to get some votes!

Now, I don't really mind that we have political hookers in Parliament, what I do mind is that they seem intent on dismantling this nation and handing over the remains to Europe and/or the minorities, for their share of the loot!

Well, I say we make them work for it for a change! Vote BNP, scare the shit out of them and we might actually get some people in the Conservatives and Labour deciding to actually do something we want!

Go on, give it a try, if enough of us do it, we could send shivers down the spines of our pompous overfed elites!

The Truth about Crunulla

Part 1.


Part 2.


Part 3.



Part 4.

Hope for Europe?

Ralph Peters of the New York Post, has written an article that I assume was meant to be insulting to Europeans, and inflate liberal American self righteous moral superiority! But it cheered me up no end!

"November 26, 2006 -- A RASH of pop prophets tell us that Muslims in Europe are reproducing so fast and European societies are so weak and listless that, before you know it, the continent will become "Eurabia," with all those topless gals on the Riviera wearing veils.
Well, maybe not."

"The notion that continental Europeans, who are world-champion haters, will let the impoverished Muslim immigrants they confine to ghettos take over their societies and extend the caliphate from the Amalfi Coast to Amsterdam has it exactly wrong."

World class haters? Hmmmm, so the rest of the world live in gardens of Eden, dancing around, with the sounds of laughter in the background, except in nasty ole Europe?

"The endangered species isn't the "peace loving" European lolling in his or her welfare state, but the continent's Muslims immigrants - and their multi-generation descendants - who were foolish enough to imagine that Europeans would share their toys."

And we should share our 'toys' for what reason?

"In fact, Muslims are hardly welcome to pick up the trash on Europe's playgrounds.
Don't let Europe's current round of playing pacifist dress-up fool you: This is the continent that perfected genocide and ethnic cleansing, the happy-go-lucky slice of humanity that brought us such recent hits as the Holocaust and Srebrenica."

Well, yes, these bastards are not liked very much at all, clean up rubbish? They live in filth and wouldn't know how to clean. And this from a guy that lives in the US that ethnically cleansed an entire continent clean of the 'native Indians'?

"THE historical patterns are clear: When Europeans feel sufficiently threatened - even when the threat's concocted nonsense - they don't just react, they over-react with stunning ferocity. One of their more-humane (and frequently employed) techniques has been ethnic cleansing."

So what was the trail of tears? A picnic?

"And Europeans won't even need to re-write "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" with an Islamist theme - real Muslims zealots provide Europe's bigots with all the propaganda they need. Al Qaeda and its wannabe fans are the worst thing that could have happened to Europe's Muslims. Europe hasn't broken free of its historical addictions - we're going to see Europe's history reprised on meth."

History, yes, it is a wonderful thing when one has it!

"The year 1492 wasn't just big for Columbus. It's also when Spain expelled its culturally magnificent Jewish community en masse - to be followed shortly by the Moors, Muslims who had been on the Iberian Peninsula for more than 800 years."

Yeah, these Moors were the remnants of an invader race, outsiders, they had been given a chance to live peaceably in Spain by Ferdinand and Isabella, they broke their oaths and rebelled, what was Spain supposed to do? Invent sink estates and let them form gangs to kill Catholics? Perhaps they could have allowed these rebels to help bring in more Moors from across the Strait of Gibraltar?

"Jews got the boot elsewhere in Europe, too - if they weren't just killed on the spot. When Shakespeare wrote "The Merchant of Venice," it's a safe bet he'd never met a Jew. The Chosen People were long-gone from Jolly Olde England."

Yeah, so what people were expelled from many nations, the US included.

"From the French expulsion of the Huguenots right down to the last century's massive ethnic cleansings, Europeans have never been shy about showing "foreigners and subversives" the door."

Ethnic cleansing that Americans aided and abetted by the way!(remember Silesia, Pomerania, Prussia and the Sudetenland?)

"And Europe's Muslims don't even have roots, by historical standards. For the Europeans, they're just the detritus of colonial history. When Europeans feel sufficiently provoked and threatened - a few serious terrorist attacks could do it - Europe's Muslims will be lucky just to be deported. "

Quite true, I look forward to that day!

"Sound impossible? Have the Europeans become too soft for that sort of thing? Has narcotic socialism destroyed their ability to hate? Is their atheism a prelude to total surrender to faith-intoxicated Muslim jihadis?"

Lets hope not!

"The answer to all of the above questions is a booming "No!" The Europeans have enjoyed a comfy ride for the last 60 years - but the very fact that they don't want it to stop increases their rage and sense of being besieged by Muslim minorities they've long refused to assimilate (and which no longer want to assimilate)."

I don't think we ever wanted them to assimilate, we just want them to go home!

"WE don't need to gloss over the many Muslim acts of barbarism down the centuries to recognize that the Europeans are just better at the extermination process. From the massacre of all Muslims and Jews (and quite a few Eastern Christians) when the Crusaders reached Jerusalem in 1099 to the massacre of all the Jews in Buda (not yet attached to Pest across the Danube) when the "liberating" Habsburg armies retook the citadel at the end of the 17th century, Europeans have just been better organized for genocide."

But of course America has never done this! (Native Indians, Nicaragua, Vietnam, etc...)

"It's the difference between the messy Turkish execution of the Armenian genocide and the industrial efficiency of the Holocaust. Hey, when you love your work, you get good at it."

This just don't make any sense, millions of Indians died quite messily in America!

"Far from enjoying the prospect of taking over Europe by having babies, Europe's Muslims are living on borrowed time. When a third of French voters have demonstrated their willingness to vote for Jean-Marie Le Pen's National Front - a party that makes the Ku Klux Klan seem like Human Rights Watch - all predictions of Europe going gently into that good night are surreal."

People vote for Le Pen because they are pissed off that our leaders ignore what we want, they are imposing this immigration on us!

"I have no difficulty imagining a scenario in which U.S. Navy ships are at anchor and U.S. Marines have gone ashore at Brest, Bremerhaven or Bari to guarantee the safe evacuation of Europe's Muslims."

Yeah, that would be funny, personally, I think you would be fools to take them, but you are welcome to them

"After all, we were the only ones to do anything about the slaughter of Muslims in the Balkans."

It was going so well till you Yanks interfered!

"And even though we botched it, our effort in Iraq was meant to give the Middle East's Muslims a last chance to escape their self-inflicted misery."

N0, you did that to ensure your oil supplies (Not that I mind, but please stop pretending it was for their good)

"AND we're lucky. The United States attracts the quality."

Well, if that's how you want to describe them, go ahead!

"American Muslims have a higher income level than our national average. We hear about the handful of rabble-rousers, but more of our fellow Americans who happen to be Muslims are doctors, professors and entrepreneurs."

???

"And the American dream is still alive and well, thanks: Even the newest taxi driver stumbling over his English grammar knows he can truly become an American."

Well its your national suicide!

"But European Muslims can't become French or Dutch or Italian or German. Even if they qualify for a passport, they remain second-class citizens. On a good day. And they're supposed to take over the continent that's exported more death than any other?"

This is why I'm becoming more hopeful for Europe, we have definite identities, that's why I also fear for America, as it does not have any identity any more, just idiots like this!

"All the copy-cat predictions of a Muslim takeover of Europe not only ignore history and Europe's ineradicable viciousness, but do a serious disservice by exacerbating fear and hatred. And when it comes to hatred, trust me: The Europeans don't need our help."

So, wanting to keep your country alive, wanting your children to inherit your nation without the stain of these fuckers on it is 'hatred'? Well then, I am steeped in it!

"The jobless and hopeless kids in the suburbs may burn a couple of cars, but we'll always have Paris."

What an insightful fellow! It is morons like this that give America a bad name! In his self righteous ignorance he assumes America is this paradise on earth, a city on a hill?

America is a nation like any other, you massacred Indians, did some dodgy things in Central America, Vietnam, etc...you 'stole half of Mexico, you 'illegally' overthrew the Hawaiian Queen and annexed this pacific Kingdom, you imposed yourselves on others, invaded lands to protect your vital interests, but stop fooling yourselves, this was not to 'free' anyone, it was for your own good, this is what nations do!

All countries do things that are unseemly, this is what power is about, to take the posturing stance of the above article is childish and dangerous, America is in danger precisely because so many Americans have fallen for this 'America is unique' bull shit, you cant take in half the world and think you will look the same or be anything like the same after the event! If 100 million Muslims were to immigrate to America in the next 10 years, America would no longer be the America you know, in 100 years it would be gone, perhaps the name would remain, but the people would be different, the way of life would be different, it would no longer be America!

It is really beginning to infuriate me, there are too many in that nation that think the rules do not apply to them, there are some like Ralph Peters, who think the rules don't apply at all, and we in Europe are 'haters' because we object to these rude, offensive outsiders taking what is ours and telling us to conform to them!

This is called reacting in a normal manner, what is abnormal is when you encourage people to come and take what is yours, to demand you accept them and their ways, this is abnormal, even suicidal, if America does not find some common sense soon enough, then I fear America will become a hodge podge of opposing ethnicities vying for land, money and opportunity.

America worked because they once only accepted, dare I say it, white Christian immigrants, that is the reason for the previous success of immigration to America, it is the only reason!

Europe, Not as bad as you think!

Something that I have noticed over the past few months is, I believe a misguided contempt of Europe and Europeans on the American 'blogosphere'.

I can understand it quite well, our leaders are contemptable snivelling cowards, but are American leaders any better?

European economies are slow growing or shrinking, quite true, socialism has been ingrained into Europe's economy, retarding it's growth! But, forgive me for pointing out that America, although growing faster then Europe on the whole is not growing as fast as Ireland, Switzerland or some East European economies, the reason for the 'low' growth of the 'European economy' is France, Italy and Germany, take them out, we are growing as fast as America, if not faster!

There are many sneering references to out of control immigration to Europe, quite true, immigration is out of control, our treasonous leaders have ensured this! But America has accepted more immigrants in the past decade then all of Europe combined! And America has 300 million people, Europe has 800 million! Also, Europeans, from what I have deduced from talking with them do not accept these people as French or Italian or English or Irish or Spanish etc... Americans seem to conclude that if someone (no matter how despicable or criminal they are) stays in America for a number of years, then they are American! You see it matters not if an Arab or an African has a French or British passport, they will never be French or British. If those same people go to America, they are as American as the descendants of the Pilgrims, or the Scotch-Irish or the Germans or Huguenots! That is not something to be proud of!

The European Union, is contemptible, invented by atheists who hate the 'true Europe', they wish to see the end of Europe and the European peoples. But they are not 'us', they are 'our' enemies! I certainly would love to see the end of the EU, it could be replaced by a free trade zone, something most Europeans would support.

Although there is much anti-Americanism, something I find childish in it's blatant but unrecognised jealousy, not all people want to be American! Some American bloggers write as if it is unthinkable that any right thinking person would not wish to be American. As much as I admire America and its constitution, it tradition of decency etc... I also do not wish to be American! I am part of a different tradition, if I was to immigrate it would be to Australia or Canada or New Zealand, nations with similar and shared histories, from their settlements to today... I understand the desire of the Italians and the French and the Germans to maintain their separateness, after all they also have great civilisations, they don't need to learn English or be just like us, if they did the world would become a greyer place.

Most Europeans that I have met on my many travels throughout the continent are decent, educated and civilised people. Opposed to the waves of immigration as much as any other sensible person. There is of course anti-Americanism, I assure you I have argued against them many times, but there are also people who, although are not anti-American do actively dislike McDonald's, Starbucks and the other chain stores from over the pond, this may seem anti-Capitalist to some, but when you are standing in the Piazza da San Marco in Venice or the ramparts of Alghero in Sardinia, or before the Grossmunster in Zurich or standing on one of Lisbon's seven hills taking in the view, you can kinda see their point! The idea of some chain store does seem like vandalism! It may be ok in a city 100 years old, but these places are mellenia old, they are living places not some discardable throw away thing, or some plastic Disney World castle, these is the real things!

I know that there is an ideology of American exceptionalism, America is a great nation, it is not exceptional, it is not immune to the currents of history or reality. The myth of the enrichment of immigration is an especially dangerous one that is part of the American narrative, one that both the right and left accept and harp on about. Anti-Immigration just does not work, because you think anyone and everyone is potentially American, this is so untrue as to be something I believe may end America as a great power, you cannot ever throw many races together and think they will become one, or that they will accept the morals and standards of the Pilgrims or the 'founding fathers', they wont! On this I believe Europe is stronger, our nations are based on an ethnic identity, immigration for us is very obviously an attack on us, as 'us' is determined by our shared ethnicity and history.

It is strange that Australia, another great immigrant society does not have as part of its national ideology, the idea that all immigration is great! But then Australia had until 30 years ago the unofficial 'White Australia policy', which originally would only allow Britons and Nordic types in. This was extended after 1945 to allow Italians, Greeks, Portuguese and Slavs. This attitude seems healthier to me, it keeps the nation relatively homogeneous. To much difference can be a danger.

I digress! Simply put, I appeal to our American cousins to realise that we are generally quite a sensible bunch, we have our weirdos like you, we also have our challenges like you! But we are not suddenly less then you, because we are not you!