Zoo Nation?

The Chinese seem to have provided an excellent Olympics, not that I'm really into it, but in the past fortnight, it has been difficult to avoid it. The opening ceremony was a celebration of Chinese culture and history, of course it was cliched and sickly sweet, but for the Chinese it was a moment of pride in their collective achievement.

What is planned for London 2012?

Well, apparently we are to be represented by a troupe of 'dancers' called Zoo Nation, an urban hip hop, rap group!

I know, I know, usually I would be swearing, and I was when I found out, but really is it a surprise? Not really, everything else is polluted with this 'diversity' shit, so why not the Olympics? In fact the bid for the Olympics was full of references to bullshit 'diversity', they had dozens of black and Asian kids in Singapore representing London!

But what an embarrassment, what a humiliation, every nation is allowed to celebrate their culture and history, except us! What a pathetic joke

Guardian article

BNP article

Another Guardian article

Free Republic article

The Saxon Code

No crown but ours shall govern here,
No strangers rule with gold or fear,
No plow but ours may slough the loam,
No prow but ours slash the spume,
No hand but ours may bind our kin,
No gods but ours proclaim a sin,
No law but ours may stay a blow,
No hand but ours may draw a bow,
No men but ours may hunt the land,
No sons but ours bear sword in hand,
No word but ours shall we trust,
No flags be flown except of us,
No land but ours do we demand,
No more than what we have farmed,
No strangers slaving on our soil,
No man unpaid or forced to toil,
No heroes praised but ours alone,
No other kin but our blood and bone,
No strangers to tell us who we are,
No obedience to any foreign laws.

Source

Resumption of service!

Ah well, that took longer then I thought!

It's been an interesting few months, the economy is going into meltdown, our glorious leaders, those imbeciles, are thrashing around feigning that they actually know anything about economics, whilst fucking people up the arse with more taxes, more fines, and debasing the currency in a reckless stupid and shortsighted fashion.

Then Gordon Brown, goes back on Labour's manifesto pledge to hold a referendum on the European Constitution, that lying spiv Brown and that shower of mediocre, treasonous shits that make up the cabinet make up some ridiculous non-sense that the Lisbon Treaty is different from the Constitution. What a crock of shit!

America seems likely to be electing Barrack Obama, some lefty half caste with an axe to grind, someone who's loyalty to the US seems at best, suspect, and whats worse, most of White America seems fine with it!!

Ron Paul was a non-event in the Republican primaries, proving that Americans seem as dedicated to their own destruction as are Europeans, what a sad state of affairs!

A storm is coming, it is the judgement awaiting us for our own craven surrender in the face of aggressive third worlders, for our selling of our birthrights, for our embrace of a destructive nihilism where there is no right, no standard, no morality and no loyalty!

This storm will be lit by the coming economic cataclysm, it will be stoked by the racial and sectarian divides that are the results of the massive and reckless immigration policies, and kept going by our complete detachment from reality!

It is, I believe, a storm we deserve and need!

Enoch Powell's 'River of Blood' speach

Note how moderate it really is, and remember how this man was smeared by the establishment who were in fear after he spoke the truth. He was smeared and destroyed, has anyone learned? Apparently not as Nigel Hasitlow has discovered! Much to Cameron's continued shame!



"The supreme function of statesmanship is to provide against preventable evils. In seeking to do so, it encounters obstacles which are deeply rooted in human nature.

One is that by the very order of things such evils are not demonstrable until they have occurred: at each stage in their onset there is room for doubt and for dispute whether they be real or imaginary. By the same token, they attract little attention in comparison with current troubles, which are both indisputable and pressing: whence the besetting temptation of all politics to concern itself with the immediate present at the expense of the future.

Above all, people are disposed to mistake predicting troubles for causing troubles and even for desiring troubles: "If only," they love to think, "if only people wouldn't talk about it, it probably wouldn't happen."

Perhaps this habit goes back to the primitive belief that the word and the thing, the name and the object, are identical.

At all events, the discussion of future grave but, with effort now, avoidable evils is the most unpopular and at the same time the most necessary occupation for the politician. Those who knowingly shirk it deserve, and not infrequently receive, the curses of those who come after.
A week or two ago I fell into conversation with a constituent, a middle-aged, quite ordinary working man employed in one of our nationalised industries.

After a sentence or two about the weather, he suddenly said: "If I had the money to go, I wouldn't stay in this country." I made some deprecatory reply to the effect that even this government wouldn't last for ever; but he took no notice, and continued: "I have three children, all of them been through grammar school and two of them married now, with family. I shan't be satisfied till I have seen them all settled overseas. In this country in 15 or 20 years' time the black man will have the whip hand over the white man."

I can already hear the chorus of execration. How dare I say such a horrible thing? How dare I stir up trouble and inflame feelings by repeating such a conversation?

The answer is that I do not have the right not to do so. Here is a decent, ordinary fellow Englishman, who in broad daylight in my own town says to me, his Member of Parliament, that his country will not be worth living in for his children.

I simply do not have the right to shrug my shoulders and think about something else. What he is saying, thousands and hundreds of thousands are saying and thinking - not throughout Great Britain, perhaps, but in the areas that are already undergoing the total transformation to which there is no parallel in a thousand years of English history.

In 15 or 20 years, on present trends, there will be in this country three and a half million Commonwealth immigrants and their descendants. That is not my figure. That is the official figure given to parliament by the spokesman of the Registrar General's Office.

There is no comparable official figure for the year 2000, but it must be in the region of five to seven million, approximately one-tenth of the whole population, and approaching that of Greater London. Of course, it will not be evenly distributed from Margate to Aberystwyth and from Penzance to Aberdeen. Whole areas, towns and parts of towns across England will be occupied by sections of the immigrant and immigrant-descended population.

As time goes on, the proportion of this total who are immigrant descendants, those born in England, who arrived here by exactly the same route as the rest of us, will rapidly increase. Already by 1985 the native-born would constitute the majority. It is this fact which creates the extreme urgency of action now, of just that kind of action which is hardest for politicians to take, action where the difficulties lie in the present but the evils to be prevented or minimised lie several parliaments ahead.

The natural and rational first question with a nation confronted by such a prospect is to ask: "How can its dimensions be reduced?" Granted it be not wholly preventable, can it be limited, bearing in mind that numbers are of the essence: the significance and consequences of an alien element introduced into a country or population are profoundly different according to whether that element is 1 per cent or 10 per cent.

The answers to the simple and rational question are equally simple and rational: by stopping, or virtually stopping, further inflow, and by promoting the maximum outflow. Both answers are part of the official policy of the Conservative Party.

It almost passes belief that at this moment 20 or 30 additional immigrant children are arriving from overseas in Wolverhampton alone every week - and that means 15 or 20 additional families a decade or two hence. Those whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad. We must be mad, literally mad, as a nation to be permitting the annual inflow of some 50,000 dependants, who are for the most part the material of the future growth of the immigrant-descended population. It is like watching a nation busily engaged in heaping up its own funeral pyre. So insane are we that we actually permit unmarried persons to immigrate for the purpose of founding a family with spouses and fiancés whom they have never seen.

Let no one suppose that the flow of dependants will automatically tail off. On the contrary, even at the present admission rate of only 5,000 a year by voucher, there is sufficient for a further 25,000 dependants per annum ad infinitum, without taking into account the huge reservoir of existing relations in this country - and I am making no allowance at all for fraudulent entry. In these circumstances nothing will suffice but that the total inflow for settlement should be reduced at once to negligible proportions, and that the necessary legislative and administrative measures be taken without delay.

I stress the words "for settlement." This has nothing to do with the entry of Commonwealth citizens, any more than of aliens, into this country, for the purposes of study or of improving their qualifications, like (for instance) the Commonwealth doctors who, to the advantage of their own countries, have enabled our hospital service to be expanded faster than would otherwise have been possible. They are not, and never have been, immigrants.

I turn to re-emigration. If all immigration ended tomorrow, the rate of growth of the immigrant and immigrant-descended population would be substantially reduced, but the prospective size of this element in the population would still leave the basic character of the national danger unaffected. This can only be tackled while a considerable proportion of the total still comprises persons who entered this country during the last ten years or so.

Hence the urgency of implementing now the second element of the Conservative Party's policy: the encouragement of re-emigration.

Nobody can make an estimate of the numbers which, with generous assistance, would choose either to return to their countries of origin or to go to other countries anxious to receive the manpower and the skills they represent.

Nobody knows, because no such policy has yet been attempted. I can only say that, even at present, immigrants in my own constituency from time to time come to me, asking if I can find them assistance to return home. If such a policy were adopted and pursued with the determination which the gravity of the alternative justifies, the resultant outflow could appreciably alter the prospects.

The third element of the Conservative Party's policy is that all who are in this country as citizens should be equal before the law and that there shall be no discrimination or difference made between them by public authority. As Mr Heath has put it we will have no "first-class citizens" and "second-class citizens." This does not mean that the immigrant and his descendant should be elevated into a privileged or special class or that the citizen should be denied his right to discriminate in the management of his own affairs between one fellow-citizen and another or that he should be subjected to imposition as to his reasons and motive for behaving in one lawful manner rather than another.

There could be no grosser misconception of the realities than is entertained by those who vociferously demand legislation as they call it "against discrimination", whether they be leader-writers of the same kidney and sometimes on the same newspapers which year after year in the 1930s tried to blind this country to the rising peril which confronted it, or archbishops who live in palaces, faring delicately with the bedclothes pulled right up over their heads. They have got it exactly and diametrically wrong.

The discrimination and the deprivation, the sense of alarm and of resentment, lies not with the immigrant population but with those among whom they have come and are still coming.
This is why to enact legislation of the kind before parliament at this moment is to risk throwing a match on to gunpowder. The kindest thing that can be said about those who propose and support it is that they know not what they do.

Nothing is more misleading than comparison between the Commonwealth immigrant in Britain and the American Negro. The Negro population of the United States, which was already in existence before the United States became a nation, started literally as slaves and were later given the franchise and other rights of citizenship, to the exercise of which they have only gradually and still incompletely come. The Commonwealth immigrant came to Britain as a full citizen, to a country which knew no discrimination between one citizen and another, and he entered instantly into the possession of the rights of every citizen, from the vote to free treatment under the National Health Service.

Whatever drawbacks attended the immigrants arose not from the law or from public policy or from administration, but from those personal circumstances and accidents which cause, and always will cause, the fortunes and experience of one man to be different from another's.
But while, to the immigrant, entry to this country was admission to privileges and opportunities eagerly sought, the impact upon the existing population was very different. For reasons which they could not comprehend, and in pursuance of a decision by default, on which they were never consulted, they found themselves made strangers in their own country.

They found their wives unable to obtain hospital beds in childbirth, their children unable to obtain school places, their homes and neighbourhoods changed beyond recognition, their plans and prospects for the future defeated; at work they found that employers hesitated to apply to the immigrant worker the standards of discipline and competence required of the native-born worker; they began to hear, as time went by, more and more voices which told them that they were now the unwanted. They now learn that a one-way privilege is to be established by act of parliament; a law which cannot, and is not intended to, operate to protect them or redress their grievances is to be enacted to give the stranger, the disgruntled and the agent-provocateur the power to pillory them for their private actions.

In the hundreds upon hundreds of letters I received when I last spoke on this subject two or three months ago, there was one striking feature which was largely new and which I find ominous. All Members of Parliament are used to the typical anonymous correspondent; but what surprised and alarmed me was the high proportion of ordinary, decent, sensible people, writing a rational and often well-educated letter, who believed that they had to omit their address because it was dangerous to have committed themselves to paper to a Member of Parliament agreeing with the views I had expressed, and that they would risk penalties or reprisals if they were known to have done so. The sense of being a persecuted minority which is growing among ordinary English people in the areas of the country which are affected is something that those without direct experience can hardly imagine.

I am going to allow just one of those hundreds of people to speak for me:

“Eight years ago in a respectable street in Wolverhampton a house was sold to a Negro. Now only one white (a woman old-age pensioner) lives there. This is her story. She lost her husband and both her sons in the war. So she turned her seven-roomed house, her only asset, into a boarding house. She worked hard and did well, paid off her mortgage and began to put something by for her old age. Then the immigrants moved in. With growing fear, she saw one house after another taken over. The quiet street became a place of noise and confusion. Regretfully, her white tenants moved out.

“The day after the last one left, she was awakened at 7am by two Negroes who wanted to use her 'phone to contact their employer. When she refused, as she would have refused any stranger at such an hour, she was abused and feared she would have been attacked but for the chain on her door. Immigrant families have tried to rent rooms in her house, but she always refused. Her little store of money went, and after paying rates, she has less than £2 per week. “She went to apply for a rate reduction and was seen by a young girl, who on hearing she had a seven-roomed house, suggested she should let part of it. When she said the only people she could get were Negroes, the girl said, "Racial prejudice won't get you anywhere in this country." So she went home.

“The telephone is her lifeline. Her family pay the bill, and help her out as best they can. Immigrants have offered to buy her house - at a price which the prospective landlord would be able to recover from his tenants in weeks, or at most a few months. She is becoming afraid to go out. Windows are broken. She finds excreta pushed through her letter box. When she goes to the shops, she is followed by children, charming, wide-grinning piccaninnies. They cannot speak English, but one word they know. "Racialist," they chant. When the new Race Relations Bill is passed, this woman is convinced she will go to prison. And is she so wrong? I begin to wonder.”
The other dangerous delusion from which those who are wilfully or otherwise blind to realities suffer, is summed up in the word "integration." To be integrated into a population means to become for all practical purposes indistinguishable from its other members.

Now, at all times, where there are marked physical differences, especially of colour, integration is difficult though, over a period, not impossible. There are among the Commonwealth immigrants who have come to live here in the last fifteen years or so, many thousands whose wish and purpose is to be integrated and whose every thought and endeavour is bent in that direction.

But to imagine that such a thing enters the heads of a great and growing majority of immigrants and their descendants is a ludicrous misconception, and a dangerous one.

We are on the verge here of a change. Hitherto it has been force of circumstance and of background which has rendered the very idea of integration inaccessible to the greater part of the immigrant population - that they never conceived or intended such a thing, and that their numbers and physical concentration meant the pressures towards integration which normally bear upon any small minority did not operate.

Now we are seeing the growth of positive forces acting against integration, of vested interests in the preservation and sharpening of racial and religious differences, with a view to the exercise of actual domination, first over fellow-immigrants and then over the rest of the population. The cloud no bigger than a man's hand, that can so rapidly overcast the sky, has been visible recently in Wolverhampton and has shown signs of spreading quickly. The words I am about to use, verbatim as they appeared in the local press on 17 February, are not mine, but those of a Labour Member of Parliament who is a minister in the present government:

'The Sikh communities' campaign to maintain customs inappropriate in Britain is much to be regretted. Working in Britain, particularly in the public services, they should be prepared to accept the terms and conditions of their employment. To claim special communal rights (or should one say rites?) leads to a dangerous fragmentation within society. This communalism is a canker; whether practised by one colour or another it is to be strongly condemned.'

All credit to John Stonehouse for having had the insight to perceive that, and the courage to say it.

For these dangerous and divisive elements the legislation proposed in the Race Relations Bill is the very pabulum they need to flourish. Here is the means of showing that the immigrant communities can organise to consolidate their members, to agitate and campaign against their fellow citizens, and to overawe and dominate the rest with the legal weapons which the ignorant and the ill-informed have provided. As I look ahead, I am filled with foreboding; like the Roman, I seem to see "the River Tiber foaming with much blood."

That tragic and intractable phenomenon which we watch with horror on the other side of the Atlantic but which there is interwoven with the history and existence of the States itself, is coming upon us here by our own volition and our own neglect. Indeed, it has all but come. In numerical terms, it will be of American proportions long before the end of the century.

Only resolute and urgent action will avert it even now. Whether there will be the public will to demand and obtain that action, I do not know. All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal."

Why America must vote for Ron Paul!

Americans have only one real choice for president in 2008 and he is Ron Paul! He is the only candidate who will limit government, he is the only candidate who will lower taxes, he is the only man who will attempt to reign in America's reckless spending, borrowing and printing of money.

Most importantly, he is the only candidate who could spark a restoration of the West.

Ron Paul is something unusual for an elected representative, he is honest, decent, honourable, wise, moral and straightforward!

He is a Christian, who is repelled by abortion, he opposes the heavy handedness of government, its theft of people's money (tax) and is committed to the abolition of the IRS, Income Tax, the CIA, FBI, NSA, Dept of Labour, Education, Homeland Security, the Federal Reserve, Dept of Health, etc...

He is committed to getting rid of America's deficit, restoring sound money and pulling all American troops out of ALL foreign fields, not just Iraq and Afghanistan!

Social Welfare and Medicare would be put on a transition to abolision.

He opposes any amnesty of illegal immigrants and will act to build a fence on the Mexican border, he would withdraw from the UN, OAS, NAFTA, WTO, World Bank, NATO and a myriad of other useless international organisations.

This truly is radically different to any other candidate and must be a truer representation of many conservative's views.

Some of these things are stuff I can only dream about, and you Americans have the chance to support him and deliver yourselves from Big Government and socialism for good!

The reason I want Paul to win, is that the example displayed to the rest of the world would inspire so many to ask, "well if the Yanks are getting rid of their Income tax, then why can't we"?

People will ask, "well the Yanks left the UN, what is it actually for"?

If Those United States abolish whole departments of state, then they may ask, "do we actually need these twenty or thirty departments"?

And if a President Paul stops illegal immigration into those United States, people over here may ask, "well if America can stop illegal immigration with a thousand mile border fence and good policing, why can't we do it when we are an island"?

The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are lost, they were a long time ago by weak willed and lily livered politicians who can only do something once they have the latest polling results before them. there is no point supporting Guilliani or McCain because they support the war, Guilliani is not exactly someone who supports liberty and McCain is all for illegal immigration and amnesty. Why any conservative would vote for Romney with his doubling of public spending whilst governor of Massachusetts or his legalising of gay marriage is beyond me, he is no conservative.

Paul is the only true conservative, he could inspire us all, he could be exactly what our elites fear and would hate, an honest man of integrity who can't be smeared by this hateful clique.

All this elite desires is our money, power over our lives, the opportunity to control what we think and do, and increasingly the desire to know us inside out, to implement an ID card, not only in the UK but in those United States too. They are even touting plans to put microchips(called RFID) inside of us!!

Already in England, the government is ready to roll out a programme that would be able to track all vehicles in the UK from satellite, they talk about a new 'pay as you drive scheme', but don't bet that they will then abolish the Vehicle Tax once this has been implemented. Every vehicle in the country must now have a black box which records the speed of the vehicle, which can be checked by police at any time.

Now it they can do that with cars, imagine what they could do with us? Implant a chip and hey presto, they will have complete power over our lives. Granted they are probably too stupid to go round being deliberately evil, but you don't have to be smart to fuck someone life up!! Think of all the mistakes government and government agencies make on a regular basis!

Our masters continue to allow massive third world immigration, why? Not only to these people form a very handy pool of loyal votes, patrons of the government, they also are guaranteed to attack us, usually mugging us or raping our women, but the odd time they detonate a bomb on bus or a train, all very convenient for governments, who can grab more power and tell us they are doing this for our good!!!

When we protest we are labelled 'racists', 'homophobes', 'xenophobes', 'right wing nuts', 'mean' and they go on doing exactly what they always wanted to do, namely fuck us sideways.

It all seems so convenient, they unleash these savages on us, we get attacked and then the government, the very same people who unleashed the savages on us, come to our rescue, only there is a price, we must give up some liberty, just a small bit, not a lot, but then this happens year after year, always they come to rescue us from the same thing, the beast they have unleashed on us!

Strange no? Suspicious even?

Our elites are already too powerful, they control the MSM, education and every branch of government. They control the international establishment, trade and currencies. There is little we can do against such raw power and might, but, there is one thing you can do if you are a citizen of those United States, you can vote for Ron Paul and shake things up, this act could undo much that this international elite of slimy backstabbing shits, have worked so hard for over the past 60 years, go on please do us all a favour and vote Ron Paul.

Jean Charles de Menezes

In those days after the bombings of July 7th, 2005, and the attempted bombings on the 21st July, we were on edge, my nerves were shot and when I heard that someone had been shot at Stockwell station I was actually happy, that the police had stopped another possible attack.

In the hours that followed we were told that the shot fellow had been seen running into the station with a bulky winter coat on, that he had vaulted the barriers and had refused to stop when police told him to.

Even when we found out the following day that the wrong guy had been shot, most of us continued to sympathise not with the dead fellow, but with the police, who, we were told, had genuinely believed they had to shoot de Menezes or that he would kill many more people.

Fair enough!

The fringe leftists who criticised the police were held in contempt, "who's side are you on anyway?" we asked, this is to protect us, not them!

I must say, looking at what we now know, how wrong I have been proved, how ashamed I am that I have said and written things about an innocent man, all because I trusted the police, an arm of this corrupt state.

I have believed the police when they reported that de Menezes was being investigated for the rape of some unnamed female, then they made a big point that he was an illegal immigrant (Well, so is half this city, at least he was working and not on welfare like some of them)

But now the Metropolitan Police are on trial, not for the murder of an Innocent man, but for 'breaching health and safety rules', that's great, a small fine at the end, some compo to the families and that should be the end of it?

The police were apparently watching an address in south London, where 'intelligence' what ever that means, indicated that a cell or those close to a cell of terrorists may have stayed. The police sit up to watch those leaving this block of flats, they see Jean Charles leave the building, but because one of the police officers is taking a piss, they can't send an image of de Menezes back to New Scotland Yard for Cressida Dick( the head honcho) to view to see if it matches the image of Hussain Osman, one of the previous days attempted bombers.

So, on one officers say so, Dick (an apt name considering her history in the Metropolitan Police)gave the order to pursue de Menezes and prevent him from entering the Underground.

A team followed him on to a bus, they could see very clearly that he was not wearing a bulky coat, but a light Summer coat, he had no bag with him as he had left it at work the previous day and was on the phone to a friend telling him he was going to be late to a job in Kilburn where he was going to fix a faulty fire alarm.

He got off at Brixton, saw that it was closed and got back on the bus to go to next station, at Stockwell he got off and walked, he did not run, he walked into the station, picked up a metro paper, got out his oyster card and opened the gate strolling down the escalator, check out this link to see Jean Charles de Menezes' last moments of life.

See how he is not running, as we were told, it is the police who run, and after he is shot the public who run up the escalators to get away from some terror they don't wish to see. The accounts given to us, state that some undercover police officers were sitting by de Menezes, that when the armed officers got on the train, the undercover officers yelled to the armed officers, 'he is here', that de Menezes got up and 'went for them', what ever that means? The police held de Meneses, the man with no suicide belt on, as he was wearing a light open summer coat, he had no weapons as he was not carrying anything with him, and he was given no warning at any time.

If he did indeed try to get away, perhaps he had twigged that something was not right about the men about him? Perhaps he thought they were immigration police, and perhaps he struggled, because unlike the Brazilian police most police officers here do not carry guns and if they do, are unlikely to use them?

So the armed police then hold de Menezes down and shoot him, not once or twice or three times but 8 times, seven bullets to his head one to his shoulder, the other 3 shots missed de Menezes, this from the self proclaimed 'crack' firearms unit at point blank range!

Now, I can understand someone killing someone if they believe they are a threat to their life, or the lives of others, but these officers did not at any time even attempt to warm de Menezes, not once! Why? Every scumbag in London will get a police warning even if they are only to get a fine, why was de Menezes just shot, and shot so many times? There was obviously no place for him to have a bomb, no where, he was wearing a light jacket which was open, where the hell did they think think the bomb was? do these officers just randomly shoot people to death for fun or something? Do they have any conscience?

Left: de Menezes, dead on a train carriage, note his jacket!

Jean Charles de Menezes was an illegal immigrant, that is true, but so are millions of others, others who scrounge off my taxes, who mug and rape all round them, who will never work and will only take, take take.

Jean Charles de Menezes was a working man, someone who did not take my taxes, he probably avoided paying tax, but then, so does anyone who can do so, I have little problem with people wanting to keep their own money instead of letting the government steal it.

The police murdered an innocent man, they made mistake after mistake (apparently, the block of flats they were watching, well that 'intelligence' was in fact bogus, so much for 'police intelligence' eh?)

Once they realised that they had murdered an innocent man, the senior management at New Scotland Yard panicked like a bunch of girls! The Commissioner Sir Ian Blair undoubtedly knew that they had killed the wrong man on that very day, even before the statement he gave linking the shooting with the 'ongoing investigation' into the previous days attacks. Blair lied.

The next day when they finally admitted that this was not a terrorist that they had killed but an innocent man, they insisted that the previous days account remained true, even though at that early stage, there were already witnesses making statements insisting de Menezes did not vault the barriers and was not running. The Metropolitan Police continued a lie.

The Met told us there was no CCTV at that station as all CCTV had been removed from all stations due to the investigation of the previous days attempted attacks. Metronet, the company that up keeps the CCTV refuted this and finally the Met were forced to admit, yes there was CCTV, the Met again lied and seems to me were attempting a cover up.

left: Still frames from that fateful day

The Met tried to smear de Menezes with that 'rape' allegation from an unnamed female, they were forced to admit a few months later that there was no truth whatsoever in those allegations, and now a few days ago the Metropolitan Police state that there was cocaine in the blood of de Menezes. Perhaps, but what of it? Many people snort coke, perhaps it was some cocaine based medicine? But here we see the police attempt another smear to justify their wanton and reckless murder of an innocent man and their failure to prevent another terrorist attack just a fortnight after the July 7th attacks.


Apparently, Jean Charles de Menezes resembles this guy? How they figured that is bizarre! What is laughable about this situation, is the police murder an innocent man, yet the scumbag they should have killed just got on a Eurostar train at Waterloo and left the country for Paris! This on the evening after the attempted attacks, and with an All Ports Warning in effect!

It seems to me that we put too much trust in the police, these are the same people who support the the ID card so they can stop us in the street willy nilly, they are the same people who arrest those who don't celebrate homosexual perversion or multi-culturalism, the very thing that allows terrorists into our nation.

They bully decent hardworking people who drive, arresting those who have had a few pints after work or who are going a few miles over the speed limit, and these are the same people who shoot innocent men on the Underground without without having the decency to inform them of their reasons to do so.

The police are not 'for us' any more, they stopped being 'for us ' a long time time ago when they became enforcers for the new socialist state we now live in, they are Blair's men, Brown's men and like them they have become liars and murderers.

Jean Charles de Menezes leaves his mother and father to mourn him, they who live in a poor part of Brazil, who had hoped for so much for their son Jean Charles, they who sent him to live with his uncle in Sao Paolo to study to be an electrician, to leave poverty behind. They will have some money now due to the Met trying to shut them up with some compo, but I think they would rather the Met was not as incompetent as they are, that if they must shoot someone, it will be deserved and if they make a mistake, resignations and prosecutions would commence without all the attempts at smears on the victim and wriggling by the management to get out of an uncomfortable situation.

And me, well, I shall never again assume that the police are trustworthy, I shall never again go along with their smears and lies, I shall endeavour to seek the truth rather then be someone who justifies their mistakes and wrongdoings.

If I could, I would apologise to Jean Charles de Menezes and his family for my ignorant remarks and unjustified smearing of a good man. May God forgive me and may Jean Charles rest in peace.





















Jean Charles de Menezes, January 7th 1978 - July 22nd 2005

Links:

Wikipedia Article

de Menezes photo manipulated

Officer 'proud' of squad

Officer knew de Menezes was not the man

Cocaine abuse could have made de Menezes 'paranoid'

The case against the Met

Justice for Jean

Western mediocrity.

I have recently been watching X Factor, the public auditions, and a few weeks ago the BBC did an India season, with various documentaries on India 'celebrating' 60 years of Indian independence.

Usually I would watch neither, as reality TV is off putting at the best of times, and it annoys me when the BBC 'celebrates' another nations anniversary, yet fails to celebrate the 300th anniversary of the Act of Union between England and Scotland which created this nation, but hey ho!

What I found interesting is how trivial this nation has become, how immature and how lacking in ambition are the Britons of today compared to the Indians.

In India, young Indians love their country, they are proud of their history and have real ambitions. Ambitions that will benefit their people and enrich their lives and those of their families.

In contrast, young Britons as seen on the X Factor are sad, fat, ugly, ignorant and completely unaware of how talentless they are. How many times can you hear from these ugly, obese and talentless individuals, "this has always been my dream, this is what I will do" and "I will be back next year, I will prove them wrong"?

The Indians however were aspiring to be engineers, doctors and architects, they were engrossed in study, yes they loved their trashy bollywood movies, but they knew were fantasy and reality lay.

The Brits, having been miseducated for generations by clueless socialists with egalitarian ideology, that taught 'everyone is special' are consumed by their own fantasies of being the next Britney Spears (why anyone would want to be her amazes me) or Christina Aguilera, but minus the looks and voice. Someone has obviously told them they are good, good enough to go on a TV reality show and be chosen to get a contract to sing.

In the Indian documentaries I watched, there was a programme about an Indian school in southern India, they showed the children practising for a local talent competition, some chose to do modern bollywood dance, others more traditional Indian dances, what stuck me was they took this seriously, practised for months and once at the competition were told in no uncertain terms whether they were good or not, the children may have cried, but knew the truth and knew that it was not cruel, but only the truth.

So many of the waddling mounds of flab on the X Factor seemed never to have had any lessons or practice, they seemed to really believe that a 18 stone teenager could get through the auditions, and when told they were not good enough threw a strop and had their equally flabby parents wobble into the audition room to harangue the judges!!!

I was struck, because this seems to me a metaphor for how certain nations are on the rise and others, unknowingly (mainly due to ignorance and idleness) are in decline. Serious nations, as Britain used to be, have good schools, rigorous examinations, disciplined training which results in engineers, doctors, businessmen, risk takers and other productive people. This is how nations manage to conquer empires and become wealthy.

Trivial nations exalt celebrity, mediocrity and ignorance, resulting in poverty and moral squalor. The only reason I can see that Britain is not already poor is because the accumulated wealth of our past is not yet spent, however with Gordon Brown on the case, raising taxes every year and borrowing hundreds of billions every year to throw away on a health service that does not work and on benefits for third world scroungers so that they will continue to vote for him, it may not be long before we find we are broke and end up being a tourist theme park for wealthy and hardworking Chinese and Indians.

How ironic and deserved that would be.

Blair is gone!

I will admit it, Gordon Brown, so far, is head and shoulders above Tony Blair and his badly acted expressions of concern for what ever it is that is the front page of that day!

In last weeks attempted attacks Brown held off calling dozens of press conferences, complete with crocodile tears, he held off promises of new 'tough' laws and he avoided turning parliament into a Gordon Brown 'fan club' as Tony Blair did the previous week with all that pathetic and unparliamentary applause given to that buffoon.

That's not to say I like Brown, it is just that in comparison to that prancing actor Blair, anyone can look good!

Thank God Blair is gone, it feels so good to be liberated from a decade of lies, spin, deceit, overweening self importance and self righteousness. It is a relief that I wont have endure another one of his many 'innovations' or destructive 'reforms' in his campaign to make this nation something it is not!

It is also a relief to have that harpie of a woman Cherie (what a stupid name) gone as well, hopefully the spouse of the PM will go back into the background where they belong, unlike the US we do not vote in a couple and do not have a 'First Lady' as some people infuriatingly entitled that meddlesome hack of a QC! The closest thing to a First Lady we have is the Queen, the de jure head of state in case anyone has forgotten over these past 10 years!

I really don't know what people saw in that man, but you voted him in 3 times on the trot, good for you, well I suppose that is 'democracy' in action.

And that creep Cameron giving that criminal and traitor a standing ovation? What the fucks wrong with him? The Tories stood and applauded someone who has degraded this nation, given away its independence, increased taxes like no other government in recent times, plundered private pensions, unleashed the third world upon us, with threats to lock up those who opposed it. Blair is a criminal and a traitor and I hope his treasonous and silly signing of the International Criminal Court back fires on him and he ends up in the Hague on war crimes charges, that would be funny and all to well deserved for a man of his dubious distinction.

Brown, although complicit in the crimes and treason of Blair, is for the moment a breath of fresh air, I have no doubt that I will despise him as well in the not to distant future, although I can't imagine hating him as much as I hate Blair, but until then I will enjoy this Blairless government!

It is also good to see Prescott, Margaret Becket, that daft tart Patricia Hewitt and John Reid gone as well, although now we have to endure that sleazy, amoral, career politician David Milliband as Foreign Secretary!

Ah well, it cant be all good I suppose!

Whats so great about democracy?

Blair, Bush, Brown and all the others 'leaders' make a big huh hah over something called 'democracy' or 'democratic rights', it sounds great if you don't think to hard!

What the hell's democracy anyway?

This present government was elected with about a quarter of the national vote, but got well over half the seats. Is that democracy?

This government has signed numerous European Treaties into law without asking the people of this nation. Is that democracy?

They abolished the old pound shillings and pence without consulting the people, they foisted the metric system on us, and prosecute traders who sell in pounds and ounces, even though no one thinks in kilograms! Is that your precious democracy?

This government and previous governments have allowed millions, yes that's right, millions of immigrants and refugees to pour into the nation in what can only be describes as a slow motion government sponsored genocide of the indigenous peoples of these islands. Is this democracy?

Democracy is in fact a weasel word! It is meaningless! Democracy can be anything you want it to be, as proved by this current government and their sleazy ways of doing things.

Democracy is a cover for the criminal and coward, it gives a fig leaf of respectability when they are up to no good. They just claim, 'this is democracy in action', 'this is the will of the people' etc, etc...

The fact that I can scrawl a mark on a piece of paper every 5 years means shit! What a big fucking deal, that really makes a fucking difference! And if you think it does make a difference, you are delusional!

At most it makes minor changes now and then, the real power in this nation is the propaganda, used, harnessed and marketed by amoral prostitutes such as Rupert Murdoch, who is only out to make yet more money( this is the guy who renounced his citizenship, so he could take up American citizenship to own a few rags and Fox)

They could not care less who is in power, as long as they are good for business! It seems strange, in 1997, the press, the entire press was going through some sort of religious experience with regards Tony Blair, I was convinced Labour would annihilate the Tories, and then they did.

What was not told was that Blair got less votes nationwide in 1997 then Major got in 1992. 14,093,007 for Major in 1992 and Blair's 1997 landslide of 13,518,167, not to worry, this story was buried as it would not fit in with the media induced anti-Tory atmosphere!

That would be hard to do now as we have this fine medium to garner news and information from, but back then, the internet was used exclusively for porn.

Remember it is perception that wins out!

Democracy, what a crock of shit, it has abolished capital punishment, legalised abortion, liberalised divorce, decriminalised homosexuality, joined the European Union, signed up to the International Criminal Court, the European Court of Human Rights. Democracy resulted in the legalised sodomising of 16 year olds, pot smoking junkies on every corner, tens of thousands of Gypsies begging and thieving in every city centre, Somalian teenaged boys, running around in gangs robbing and raping all around them, Muslims preaching death to the infidel and detonating themselves on public transport.

This is democracy, this is what it is! Every single thing mentioned above was qualified when passed, when capital punishment was abolished, they promised us that 'life would mean life', they lied, life now means 5 years in prison, murder actually pays in this country!

When abortion was passed, they vowed it was a very limited type of abortion, only those women who were physically unable or who were mentally unable would be allowed abort a child, they lied here too. We now effectively have abortion on demand.

When they decriminalised homosexuality, they said it would not be the thin end of the wedge, that this was a humane thing to do, perhaps, but with this they lied and betrayed us too. We now have gay marriage, gay adoption and 40 year old men sodomising 16 year old boys.

Immigration is something we have been lied to by these cynical fucks for the past 40 years. Some parts of this country are no longer British, they have minarets towering over the streets, women walking about in shawls or burqas. We have white women being raped, or just shagged by these ethnics and then left when they fall pregnant. We have whole streets strewn with filth and rubbish like some Algerian casbah. Gypsies, everywhere, with their filthy nasty offspring they beg on the corners and on the underground, they pick pocket and thieve, and when caught they wipe vaginal fluids on the police officers so as to make an allegation of sexual assault latter on. These politicians, these democratically elected politicians lied to us about this too, they assured us that immigration would be controlled.

These democratically elected politicians lied, lied and lied again. This in a democracy!

Perhaps it's time we had a bit more aristocracy or monarchy?

The House of Lords has always been more sensible then that other house, the house of scoundrels and liars and thieves. The house of Lords worked and worked well because they were not elected, they did not have to make vacuous statements, they did not have to make promises that they would break, they did not even have to turn up if they did not have the interest, they went unpaid with no offices. How glorious is that? A house full of people there not through lies and theft and cheating and party hackery, but there because of an accident of birth, some plonkers yes, but they usually did not bother to ever turn up, but the great minds, the decent men who would never have otherwise spoken in Parliament or stood for election as they had lives to live and did not have to temerity to lie so readily.

Well, that house of thieves and scum has chased out the decent house, no more hereditary peers, no more unelected Dukes or Barons or Earls, good men, decent patriotic men who attempted to revise the worst legislation vomited up from the lower house, they also had great and honest debates regarding the great issues of the day, something the rightly entitled lower house would never deign to debate!

What is so great about democracy?

I really can only think of waste, lies and wickedness unbound from their stained and immoral hands.

Democracy, it's an expensive destructive lie!

I wish for my liberty, the freedom to live as I wish, democracy and democratically elected politicians are in direct opposition to this aim.

The best thing for us all would be to abolish the House of Commons, and restore the House of Lords in all its former glory and power!

Then perhaps we can rest and live our lives as we would, knowing their lordships are directing the affairs of state with wisdom and humility not lying to us, not sleezing about for votes not steeling from us!

Let the cry be heard, Abolish the Commons!

Abortion, Catholic Cardinal tells it as it is!

It seems that Catholic Bishops are no longer allowed to speak out against what they believe to be sin, unless that sin happens to be 'war', 'racism' and the other fashionable 'isms' of today!

Some poor Cardinal found this out when he committed his own 'sin' (in the eyes of the holier then thou left wing theocratic state) when he condemned abortion and asked people to think twice before supporting people claiming to be Catholics when they support abortion!

He also asked Catholic politicians to reassess their connections to the Church and the suitability of supporting abortion and taking communion!

Predictably the poor fellow has been smeared by the usual nihilists and hard core atheists at the BBC, if you look at Biased BBC, Thursday 31st May post, you will see that they have noted that the BBC has framed this whole story differently from another similar story a while back. But one story is about the Archbishop of Canterbury condemning the government for going to war, something the BBC loves to hear from anyone, even some fuddy duddy fairy tale believer! But, the other involves abortion, something the left venerates as much as any Catholic venerates Mary or one of the Saints!

It is part of the left wing belief system, abortion is seen as one of their sacraments, a noble thing to do, something that guarantees a woman's continued independence from all that old fashioned non - sense, family, faith, humility and love!

What we are now supposed to cleave to is sexual incontinence, wild lust, and complete independence from other people. If we do need to depend on someone, it will be the state, the state will be there when you are born, it will register you, and create a number for you (National Insurance Number) they will pay child care so the mother can go to work, if she does not want to work, well, they will just raise the taxes until no one can afford to support a family with one income!

Then with both parents at work, the child is there ready to be indoctrinated by this behemoth state, always well meaning, almost always damaging. It shall start by teaching your child 'diversity', surely the most important thing? Then they shall go on to teach them history with reference to 'diversity'. 'Diversity' shall be in all and all shall be 'diversity'.

When the family finds it is too poor to survive due to all the crippling and weighty taxes, they shall apply for tax credits and they shall have to write page after page of justification to the tax man as to why they should have the extra few quid a week.

The child shall go to school and 'diversity' shall be the pinnacle of all that he learns. He will be trained to think of Black and ethnic people as his equal, indeed, he will learn of their infinitely higher and more moral wisdom, he shall learn that Africa is the centre of Man (although to him he will be taught Human Beings) He shall learn that religion is a backward fairy tale (excepting all non Christian religions) He shall be taught to laugh at those who have faith in Christ, or are proud of their nation.

He shall learn to despise himself, just as he despises his nation, race and people. He shall be cocooned in the loveless embrace of the state, one from which he will be lucky to escape!

For those unlucky enough to remain within the embrace of the state, shall become more degraded, more desperate, more miserable and in the end all alone!

The state can attempt to be many things, but it can never be your friend, it will never be your family. Amazingly there are many people who seem to think they will always have these state benefits to latch onto, they seem to think it unimportant to love, or have a family or a home, they assume they will find someone in a few years time, always in a few years time until it is too late. Some cite the environment or their pleasure as an excuse not to breed, or as a way of excusing their abortion!

Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (as he was at the time) has said the following!

“A Christianity that believes it has no other function than to be completely in tune with the spirit of the times has nothing to say and no meaning to offer. It can abdicate without more ado.”

Yet, the lefties seem to think the opposite of what Ratzinger said, they only tolerate Christianity if it shuts up and keeps it's head down and does not step out of line.

Cardinal Keith O'Brien has stood up against this tyranny, let us hope he does not stand down!

Girl fed to oblivious punters!

Sometimes something so depraved comes into the open that it genuinely shocks! This is one of them, one that is not being reported by the MSM, only local press are bothering, the reason is that a 14 year old white school girl was murdered, after having sex with a takeaway guy in an alley, and then cut up and fed to the customers!

Now, if this was a case of an ethnic cut up by a whitey! Oh the rage of the MSM would be hard to contain!

"I KILLED her. . . I was just angry."

Albattikhi, 29, had been having sex with Charlene before she died, the jury was told.

She was one of a number of young white girls who went into alleyways behind restaurants in Blackpool to have sex with the men who worked in the takeaways.

What? little girls going to shag 30 year old men? In some grimy alley? This, my friends is what is becoming of our society. This the result of liberalism, the apathy of those who allow or encourage the young to give away their virginity to some grease ball in a smelly alley way! I wonder, is this what those liberals wanted when they set us blindly in this direction?

Did they want us to drown in the filth of our iniquity? Did they desire the final fall of our culture? Did they want little white girls to act as whores don't even do?

This single sentence is repulsive, little girls having sex with 29 or 30 year men! Where were all those fucking social workers and police when this was happening? Organising housing for some fucker that had just got off the boat? Arresting some white man for 'racially aggravated insults'?

This is the fruition of the liberal 'democratic' state, this is your precious 'freedom', freedom to fuck old men, or little girls in some dirty alleyway, freedom to indulge in every filthy depravity you can envisage!

This is not freedom, this is slavery, to our basest instincts! Our leaders make a fine attempt in talking about defending our freedoms and 'democracy', but in truth, they never even knew what freedom was, true freedom, is to be free from this modern day all pervasive state with its corrupting hand and it's whore money!

True freedom entails taking responsibility for one's self and making one's own way in the world. It means not taking handouts, not screwing any system, it means working hard for one's income, it means not thinking of any government as any thing more then an irritant to be avoided or gotten over. It means taking responsibility for one's offspring and not seeing one's daughter become a hobby whore. It means failing and accepting those failures and not blaming others or society or rich people or 'the government' (although the government can be blamed for much more!)

When Blair talks of freedom he talks of the freedom the indulge in depravity and stupidity, to stuff one's self with amphetamines and alcohol to the point of vomiting, to treat sex as some pastime, enough to make the street whores blush!

This is not freedom, it is hedonism and somehow, dangerously, we have confused the two!

D H Lawrence (known for his homosexuality, even he had a better idea of freedom) writes

"Men are free when they are in a living homeland, not when they are straying and breaking away. Men are free when they are obeying some deep, inward voice of religious belief ... Men are free when they belong to a living, organic, believing community, active in fulfilling some unfulfilled, perhaps unrealized purpose ...Men are not free when they are doing just what they like. The moment you can do just what you like, there is nothing you care about doing ..."

Charlene went missing in November 2003. Her body has never been found.

Prosecutor Tim Holroyde, QC, told Preston Crown Court Albattikhi and others had openly talked about Charlene.

He said: "These people were talking about sex with white girls and there was mention of having sex with Charlene."Albattikhi laughed and said she was kinky and she was very small – the plainest possible indication that he was lying to the police when he said he did not know her.

Do you see the contempt that these Arabs have for us as a race? They screw our women and laugh, they see it as we should see it, an act of aggression! Yet we are so apathetic we don't care, so what if my sister is banging some different guy every night of the week, it is her life, so what is my brother is smoking pot! It's not that dangerous! These are the attitudes of those who don't care, those who have capitulated to the liberal tyranny in this land!

If your sister acts like a whore, she is a whore, if your brother acts like some junkie, he is a junkie!

"He and others present were then laughingly saying that Charlene had gone into the kebabs."

Police targeted Albattikhi, a Jordanian immigrant, and his colleague Mohammed Reveshi, who is originally from Iran, after information from witnesses.

Both had a financial stake in Funny Boyz on Dickson Road. Albattikhi is charged with murder while Reveshi, 50, is charged with helping Albattikhi dispose of Charlene's body.

Both men deny the charges and have told police they never knew the girl.

This is the way we live!

Shame on all of us.

Thank God, Blair is going!

But does it mean the beginning of the end of the New Labour project?

Lets hope so!

I always found it odd, that anyone, anywhere could actually like Blair, trust him or think him a decent normal guy! I don't want to blow my own trumpet, but since his election as Labour leader 1994, with his fake smile, hideous wife, jeans and all the other signs of someone who does not take the position of the Queen's prime minister very seriously, I have loathed him and all he stands for!

My prejudice was further entrenched by a book by Leo Mckinstry, a former socialist, who wrote Fit to Govern? in 1996, one year before Blair's landslide victory in 1997.

I told people about Blair, I told them about his lies, the constitutional vandalism he was waiting to unleash, I told them about his europhilia, his stupid, craven crawling to public oppinion!

No one listened!

When he won, I assumed that he wouldn't last, surely now the people would see through this paper cutout of a man?

No, they moaned, but kept on voting for him!

He joined America in bombing another nation, without UN approval, no not Iraq, Serbia, and no one cared!

He sends troops into a failed African state and keeps them there for years, again, no one cares!

He, rapes the constitution of the United Kingdom, with little real response, the glorious and unelected House of Lords, a place that usually is more in step with reality and common sense then the elected House of Commons, was stripped of the old Dukes, Earls, Barons and Marquess', now we are left with a wholly appointed House of Lords (no prizes for guessing who appointed them)

Blair made treason his bedfellow and guide, he wantonly and without recall to our glorious dead, gave away more and more of the ancient liberties of England to those prostitutes in Brussels.

His mistress was the infantile media, he courted it, charmed it and led it any which way he choose, he hoodwinked them and through them many people in this land.

He stood by, and actively participated in the looting of this nation, he took the pensions of the old, he stealthily taxed us, more and more, and then, in two joyous weeks, the people rose up against him and his tyranny, the Fuel Protests of 2000, restored my faith in the people of this land.

But he lied and spinned his way out of that one, infuriatingly, he not only survived, he went on to win the general election of 2001!

His Friends, were liars, adulterers, sodomites, thieves and knaves, they plundered the country, parading their depravity before all to see, they show no shame, no repentance when they are caught, no regret at the damage they have caused, indeed, they claim to have brought a new renaissance to what was a blighted nation!

They have allowed millions of illegals into this country(this is an island, how difficult can it be to secure our borders?) they have allowed these animals to trample over the indigenous people of these islands, they have appeased terrorists at every juncture, seeming to gain pleasure at this appeasement.

This group of sodomites and thieves thinks it quite normal to corrupt and weaken the police forces in this country by accusing them of 'institutional racism' and then to expect that same police force (sorry 'service') to meet a raft of 'targets' to make Britain safe again.

Targets are introduced into the Health Service, Police, Home Office and Immigration. No longer do constables, nurses, civil servants or Immigration officers do their jobs, they fill in forms, justifying their existence to this government of thieves and sodomites!

When targets are not met, the thieves and sodomites change the targets and declare a target achieved, they dumb down exams in schools and with bare faced cheek, they proclaim that children today are better educated then they were even ten or twenty years ago.

This government of knaves and sodomites parades all the failures of the past decade in front of us and declare it a victory! They expect us to celebrate with them, indeed, if we do not celebrate with them, they criminalise us and imprison us in goals filled with immigrant scum, the same scum who came here as refugees and were never deported!

They mock God with their 'gay marriage', they mock us with their failed and ruinous policies.

Anthony Blair did to his credit stand by America after the September 11th attacks in 2001, but even here, he has failed, he has failed to wage war with a lions heart, he has appeased Islam and given it the chance to thrive in this ancient Christian nation.

Thank God he is going, for he has been there far too long, no good came of him, only degredation, and decay.

Elections 2007

The local English elections have resulted in one gain for the BNP!

That is out if 10,000 local seats throughout the country, not exactly what one would call impressive no matter how the BNP spins it!

What has shocked me, is the amount of people still willing, and seemingly eager to vote for Labour!

I thought everone hated Labour for the 'War'? Or not spending enough on the 'elf service or not allowing in enough immigrants?

But I suppose all those hypocrites always intended to vote Labour anyway. I heard one man on the news say, that he voted Labour, because he has always voted Labour and always will!

What a fucking idiot!

Get an immagination!

So, in brief, nothing much has changed here, except in Scotland, although how much it has changed we shall have to see, as the SNP are chronic lefties themselves.

France has been a bit more interesting, Nicholas Sarkozy is now President elect, who will take over on the 16th May, he has run a good campaign, and a seemingly honest campaign. If he keeps to his word France may be in for a few momentus years ahead!

In America, the whole Presidential race is terminally boring, even the ones I assumed would be of some interest such as Guiliani are conspicious by their invisibility!

What I beleive Britain and America need, is some sort of proportional voting system, it would turn these boring contests into something more exiting, it would also give us more people to vote for without having to waste our votes!

Vote BNP!

There are local elections in England and Wales on May 3rd, there are also assembly elections in Scotland and Wales.

If you want anything to change vote for the BNP!

Even if you are uncomfortable with them as a party, or despise where they came from, the truth is, our political elites will not listen to us if we vote Labour or Conservative or Liberal, or Monster Raving Loony Party!

They will only fear us if we dare to vote BNP!

You see, most of the political class are political prostitutes, they will do almost anything to get into power, they will go on the Jonathan Ross Show, they will play soccer (badly) for all to see, they will feign interest in pop groups, they will say they passionately believe in the environment or Africa to get some votes!

Now, I don't really mind that we have political hookers in Parliament, what I do mind is that they seem intent on dismantling this nation and handing over the remains to Europe and/or the minorities, for their share of the loot!

Well, I say we make them work for it for a change! Vote BNP, scare the shit out of them and we might actually get some people in the Conservatives and Labour deciding to actually do something we want!

Go on, give it a try, if enough of us do it, we could send shivers down the spines of our pompous overfed elites!

Iran won!

John Bolton, the former American Ambassador to the UN has said that 'Iran won' in the recent standoff between Iran and Britain!

I fear he is right!

"If the outcome of the stand-off with Iran was a success for British diplomacy, "one hesitates to ask what would constitute failure," Bolton wrote in the business daily. "

I have to agree with him here, the embarrassing situation into which Britain has been launched has been a disaster from beginning to end!

First we have a navy and armed personnel who do not have the equipment to properly protect themselves, we have a government that regularly dumps upon the military, either using them as an arm of the left wing policies of this state, or alternatively as a scape goat for 'racism' 'sexism' and the other currently unacceptable 'isms' around today!

This government also believes that they can constantly cut the armed forces budgets, whilst committing them to more and more fields of war! How long this can continue is unclear, the effect on morale is already apparent!

The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are also deeply unpopular at home, making the fighting of these wars even harder, in this the government is wholly to blame! First they exaggerate the threat posed by Iraq (Something that makes it almost impossible to fight future wars!), then they make blunder after blunder in the administration of Iraq, all the time refusing to fight the leftist defeatism rife in the press, leaving the left to make the case that Iraq was a disaster, and this war of propaganda was lost long ago!

So, in some ways it is understandable why these troops surrendered so readily, why bother risking one's life so recklessly, why risk one's life for a cause no one at home believes in? Why bother fighting when one's political masters treat one with such obvious disdain?

But this is not the disaster of which I write! That came after this litany of incompetence!

Surrender can be acceptable in some circumstances, there are times when being brave is to be wise! The embarrassment was not the surrender, but the manner of their confinement!

The way in which the British captives behaved was a disgrace, mainly to themselves! It is one thing for the government to dump on you or for the press to smear your name or for the PC brigade to attack you for all you do and do not do, that is one thing! No matter how much shit is thrown at you, you still have your honour! This is what those captives gave away whilst in Iran, they gave away their honour!

This is the thing which I believe upsets people, this is what will not be forgotten quickly by the world!

Weakness was shown in Iran, not physical weakness, but moral weakness, these men and woman had no honour, and if they did, they have it no more! By extension neither does Britain!

Shocked and disgusted!

Apparently, those fine fellows who surrendered to the Iranian bandits without a fight, who then fully co-operated with their captors in their propaganda, who then thanked their captors when set free, who then gave some pathetic excuse that there was no point in resisting! You remember them? Well, now they are to sell their stories to the papers for tens of thousands of pounds!



So, they wimp out in battle, they indulge their captors and not only get off scott free, but get a handsome reward for it?

Words fail me, these people are little better then the media whores that inhabit the Big Brother houses, these people are so undeserving of any sympathy, it astounds me, do you remember that Italian men, who when told to beg for mercy before they cut off his head refused, tore off his hood and shouted "I will show you how an Italian dies"

Brave, I suppose it is something you are or are not! These armed personnel quite definitely do not have it! Whats the bet half of them convert to Islam within a year?

Well, I suppose you have to have some sort of ability to believe in something to do even that!





These people, who so easily could have been heroes, have in my eyes dishonoured and disgraced themselves, their families and their country, they have failed us, they have failed their Sovereign Lady and now they wish to prostitute themselves for money to the tabloids, with no shame! Even whores have more honour!

Cowards!

I have tried not to criticise the marines and sailors involved in the 'crisis', but the more I see and hear, the more outraged I am by their behaviour when in captivity.

I know, you say 'you were not there, you were not in fear of your life', quite true, but I am entitled to my opinion none the less!

The behaviour of the captives has been nothing short of cowardly and treasonous! Faye Turney should not have been there in the first place, but having given into the lesbian feminist brigade, she should not have been so meek, so easily prodded into writing letters and making 'confessions' on TV, and what was she doing wearing that hijab? Cowardice!

Then we had Faye Turney and 2 colleagues 'confess' to entering Iranian territorial waters, they were smiling, as if this was all some jolly joke! Where is that old virtue of pride?

Then they meekly go cap in hand to Ahmedinejad and thank him for their 'holiday'!

Where is their honour? For what did they think they joined the armed forces for, travel opportunities? Work experience?

Treason, dishonour and cowardice!

They should be ashamed of themselves!

These people should not be in the military, they should not be there to humiliate this country and betray its people and their Queen, they deserve to be Court Marshaled and given dishonourable discharges! The sooner the better!

To be GOVERNED is to be watched, inspected, spied upon, directed, law-driven, numbered, regulated, enrolled, indoctrinated, preached at, controlled, checked, estimated, valued, censured, commanded, by creatures who have neither the right nor the wisdom nor the virtue to do so.

To be GOVERNED is to be at every operation, at every transaction noted, registered, counted, taxed, stamped, measured, numbered, assessed, licensed, authorized, admonished, prevented, forbidden, reformed, corrected, punished.

It is, under pretext of public utility, and in the name of the general interest, to be placed under contribution, drilled, fleeced, exploited, monopolized, extorted from, squeezed, hoaxed, robbed; then at the slightest resistance, the first word of complaint, to be repressed, fined, vilified, harassed, hunted down, abused, clubbed, disarmed, bound, choked, imprisoned, judged, condemned, shot, deported, sacrificed, sold, betrayed, and to crown all, mocked, ridiculed, derided, outraged, dishonoured.

That is government; that is its justice; that is its morality.